Exploring Evaluation Strategies for the "College English Listening, Speaking, and Viewing" Course in the Era of Big Data

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jbdc.202301212

Author(s)

Li Wang*

Affiliation(s)

School of Foreign Languages, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai, 264005, Shandong, China *Corresponding Author.

Abstract

University education is an important stage in everyone’s educational journey, and the curriculum offered in universities is crucial for cultivating talent. Therefore, how to evaluate university courses effectively has become a topic that must be studied in order to improve the quality of teaching. Curriculum quality evaluation is an important aspect of the teaching system for college English courses. Establishing a comprehensive, objective, scientific, and accurate evaluation system is crucial for achieving the teaching goals of college English. With the progress of the times and the development of technology, especially the rapid advancement of digital technology and artificial intelligence, new course content and teaching methods are constantly changing. Correspondingly, the evaluation standards and methods for assessing the suitability of these new content and methods should also be improved. This paper will explore the effectiveness and adaptability of curriculum evaluation for the “College English Listening, Speaking, and Viewing” course in the context of university education and propose feasible teaching strategies based on the evaluation results.

Keywords

Big Data Era; University Education; Curriculum Evaluation; Teaching Strategy

References

[1]Dong, T. (2015). The development and characteristics of national curriculum evaluation in England since 1988. Education and Teaching Research, 3, 22-26. [2]Liu, S., & Wang, C. (2014). Analysis of problems and countermeasures of national quality course evaluation. Journal of Huainan Normal University, 1, 132-135. [3]Wang, J. S.(2014). Exploration of the construction approach of teaching quality assurance system in local higher education based on professional and curriculum evaluation. China University Teaching, 2, 61-67. [4]Zhang, W. J. (2022). Construction of the system of management and system of higher education teaching in colleges and universities—Review of "Research on Teaching Management Innovation and Practice in Undergraduate Colleges and Universities". China Higher Education Research, 3, 97. [5]Strong, R. W., & Silver, H. F. (2001). Teaching what matters most: Strategies for raising student achievement. Association for Supervision Curriculum Development Alexandria. Virginia USA, 87. [6]Fan, L.Z. (2021). A discussion on the innovative and operational cultural management of the reform of the management mechanism of higher education. Cultural Industry, 21, 76-77. [7]Zhang, H. (2015). Evaluation and research on college English classroom teaching. Peking University Press, 82. [8]Guo, M. (2013). College English teaching evaluation and improvement. Beijing Normal University Press, 77. [9]Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education. Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. [10]Black, P., & William, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5-31. [11]Buck, G. A., & Trauth-Nare, A. E. (2009). Preparing teachers to make the formative assessment process integral to science teaching and learning. The Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 475-494. [12]Cui, L. (2004). Analysis of the role of students in multimedia projection-based college English classroom teaching mode. Foreign Language World, 2, 45-46.