Analysis of the Impact of the Maturity of Digital Transformation Capability of Prefabricated Construction Enterprises on Green Innovation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jbm.202409307

Author(s)

Xuan Qiao, Hui Sun

Affiliation(s)

School of Economics and Management, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou, Liaoning, China

Abstract

In the context of sustainable development, countries around the world place greater emphasis on green innovation in environmental policies, and the maturity of digital transformation capabilities may play an important role in improving green innovation. This article aims to explore the impact of the maturity of digital transformation capabilities of prefabricated construction enterprises on green innovation. The article first elaborates on the concepts of digital transformation and green innovation; secondly, the meaning, development process, and evaluation methods of the maturity evaluation model were explained. Finally, the impact of the maturity of digital transformation capabilities of prefabricated construction enterprises on green innovation was explained. Through analysis, the importance of digital transformation and environmental green innovation has been highlighted. This analysis can help businesses understand their current situation and identify potential improvement methods.

Keywords

Prefabricated Buildings; Digital Transformation; Maturity Evaluation; Green Innovation

References

[1] Vial G. Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda. The journal of strategic information systems, 2019, 28(2): 118-144. [2] Ni Kejin, Liu Xiuyan Digital Transformation and Enterprise Growth: Theoretical Logic and Chinese Practice. Economic management, 2021, 43(12): 79-97. [3] Wishing He Liang and Wang Chunjuan Under the strategic background of the new development pattern of "dual circulation", the digital transformation of industries: theory and countermeasures. Finance and Trade Economy, 2021, 42(03): 14-27. [4] Skare, M.; Soriano, D.R. How Globalization is Changing Digital Technology Adoption: An International Perspective. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2021, 6(4): 222–233. [5] Bresciani, S.; Huarng, K. H.; Malhotra, A.; Ferraris, A. Digital Transformation as a Springboard for Product, Process and Business Model Innovation. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 128, 204–210. [6] Pata, U.K. Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption, Economic Complexity, CO2 Emissions, and Ecological Footprint in the USA: Testing the EKC Hypothesis with a Structural Break. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28(1), 846–861. [7] Wu Fei, Hu Huizhi, Lin Huiyan, etc Digital Transformation of Enterprises and Capital Market Performance: Empirical Evidence from Stock Liquidity. Managing the World, 2021, 37(07): 130-144. [8] Boons, Frank, Luedeke-Freund F. Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013, 45, 9–19. [9] Damanpour, Fariborz. Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34 (3), 555–590. [10] Triguero, Angela, Moreno-Mondéjar, Lourdes, Davia, María A. Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs. Ecological Economics, 2013(92), 25–33. [11] Blattel-Mink, B. Innovation towards Sustainable Economy-the Integration of Economy and Ecology in Companies. Sustainable Development, 1998, 6(2): 49-58. [12] Gunasekaran, A., Spalanzani, A. Sustainability of manufacturing and services: Investigations for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 140(1): 35-47. [13] Chen Huabin on Green Innovation and Its Incentive Mechanisms. Soft Science, 1999(3): 43-44. [14] Ma Jun, Zhu Bin, He Xuan How can family businesses become more proactive drivers of green innovation? Explanation based on social emotional wealth and institutional legitimacy. Journal of Management Science, 2020(9): 31 - 60. [15] Wang Jingjing, Sun Gailing, Gao Yao Research on the Construction of a Maturity Evaluation Model for Enterprise Internal Control Capability. Friends of Accountants, 2023, (22): 105-112. [16] Ma Kuan, Wang Kunsheng Generalized Technology Maturity Evaluation Model. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2017, 37(03): 735-741. [17] Andreas Schumacher and Selim Erol and W. Sihn A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises. Procedia CIRP, 2016, 52: 161-166. [18] Remane G, Hanelt A., Wiesboeck F, et al. Digital Maturity in Traditional Industries-An Exploratory Analysis. The 25th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), 2017. [19] Jiang Xin, Zhou Xuan Digital Maturity Model: Research Review and Prospects. Foreign Economy and Management, (2023): 1-18. [20] Dang P, Niu Z, Gao S, et al. Critical factors influencing the sustainable construction capability in prefabrication of chinese construction enterprises . Sustainability, 2020, 12(21): 8996. [21] Ernstsen S N, Whyte J, Thuesen C, et al. How innovation champions frame the future: Three visions for digital transformation of construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2021, 147(1): 05020022. [22] Dong T, Yin S, Zhang N. New energy-driven construction industry: Digital green innovation investment project selection of photovoltaic building materials enterprises using an integrated fuzzy decision approach. Systems, 2022, 11(1): 11. [23] Liu J, Teng Y. Evolution game analysis on behavioral strategies of multiple stakeholders in construction waste resource industry chain. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30(7): 19030-19046.