The Effect of Appearance Novelty on Product Purchase Intention
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jbm.202409404
Author(s)
Xinjia Tian*
Affiliation(s)
Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
*Corresponding Author.
Abstract
In recent years, with the changing needs of people and the impact of COVID-19, competition among enterprises has become increasingly fierce. Product is the foundation of enterprise survival in the market. In order to enhance their competitiveness, enterprises often improve their products, taking product appearance as a breakthrough point. For consumers, appearance is the first impression of a product. When the appearance of a product is changed, it will immediately attract consumers' attention. A novel product appearance may boost sales for a company, but it may also bring perceived risks to consumers. Since there are different conclusions about the effect of appearance novelty on consumers' purchase intention, this study tries to find the boundary conditions of this mechanism. In this study, relevant researches were collected and reviewed by literature method to lay a theoretical foundation for this experiment. Then, data were obtained by questionnaire experiment method. Finally, through data analysis, it was concluded that product type (public product VS private product) regulates the influence of appearance novelty on consumers' purchase intention. Specifically, the novelty of appearance of items used in public places has a significant positive influence on purchase intention.
Keywords
Novelty of Appearance; Purchase Intention; Public Product; Private Product; Use Situation; Product Type; Product Design
References
[1]Li Dongjin, Jin Huizhen, Zheng Jun. A study on the effect of product display on the evaluation of extremely inconsistent new products. Management Review,2018,30(09):97-109+163.
[2]Bloch P H. Seeking the Ideal Form: product design and consumer response. Journal of Marketing, 1995, 59(3): 16-29.
[3]Mugge R, Schoormans J P L. Product design and apparent usability. the influence of novelty in product appearance. Applied ergonomics, 2012, 43(6): 1081-1088.
[4]LI Dongjin,LI Yan, WU Ruijuan. Consumer aesthetic experience in the field of product design. Advances in Psychological Science,2013,21(02):336-346.
[5]Berkowitz M. Product shape as a design innovation strategy. Journal of product innovation management, 1987, 4(4): 274-283.
[6]Nussbaum B. The power of design. Business week, 2004, 17(5): 2004.
[7]Lawson B. How designers think. Routledge, 2006.
[8]Reber R, Schwarz N, Winkielman P. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2004, 8(4): 364-382.
[9]Talke K, Salomo S, Wicringa JE, et al. What about design newness? Investigating the relevance of a neglected dimension of product innovativeness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2009, 26. (6): 601-615.
[10]Mugge R, Dahl D W, Schoormans J P L. “What you see, is what you get?” guidelines for influencing consumers' perceptions of consumer durables through product appearance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2018, 35(3): 309-329.
[11]Liu Y, Li K J, Chen H, et al. The effects of products' aesthetic design on demand and marketing-mix effectiveness: the role of segment prototypicality and brand consistency. Journal of Marketing, 2017, 81(1): 83-102.
[12]Li Xiaojun. The two-sided effect of design novelty on purchase intention: the moderating role of self-construal. Shandong University of Technology,2021.
[13]Hekkert P, Snelders D, Wieringen P C W V. 'Most advanced, yet acceptable': typicity and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. British Journal of Psychology, 2003, 94(Pt 1): 111-124.
[14]Rubera G, Droge c. Technology versus design innovation's effects on sales and tobin's Q: The moderating role of branding strategy, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2013, 30(3): 448.464.
[15]Castano R, Sujan M, Kacker M, et al. Managing consumer uncertainty in the adoption of new products: temporal distance and mental simulation. Journal of Marketing Research, 2008, 45(3): 320-336.
[16]Jaeger S R, Cardello A V, Jin D, et al. Product uniqueness: further exploration and application of a consumer-based methodology. Food Quality and Preference, 2017, 60: 59-71.
[17]Cox D, Cox A D. Beyond first impressions: the effects of repeated exposure on consumer liking of visually complex and simple product designs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2002, 30(2): 119-130.
[18]Hekkert P, Snelders D, Wieringen P C W V. 'Most advanced, yet acceptable': typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. British Journal of Psychology, 2003, 94(Pt 1): 111-124.
[19]Mugge R, Dahl D W. Seeking the ideal level of design newness: consumer response to radical and incremental product design. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2013, 30(s1): 34-47.
[20]Stock R M, Zacharias N A. Two sides of the same coin: How do different dimensions of product program innovativeness affect customer loyalty?. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2013, 30(3): 516-532.
[21]Bearden W O, Etzel M J. Reference Group Influence on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions Journal of Consumer Research, 1982, 9(2):183-194.
[22]Childers T L, Rao A R. The influence of familial and peer-based reference groups on consumer decisions. Journal of consumer research, 1992, 19(2): 198-211.
[23]Cheema A, Kaikati A M. The Effect of Need for Uniqueness on Word of Mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 2010, 47(3):553-563.
[24]Ratner R K, Kahn B E. The impact of private versus public consumption on variety-seeking behavior. Journal of consumer research, 2002, 29(2): 246-257.
[25]Wang HZ, Fan XW, Ouyang JY. Consumer self-concept, uniqueness demand and brand logo shape preference. Journal of Psychology, 2017, 49(8):1113-1124.
[26]YU Chunling, ZHU Xiaodong, WANG Xia, et al. Face Sense and Green Product Purchase Intention - The Moderating Role of Usage Context and Relative Level of Price. Management Review,2019,31(11):139-146.
[27]Zhang Kang. A study of the effects of consumer self-construal and money concept on the willingness to adopt new products. Tianjin University of Technology,2019.
[28]Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. 1975.
[29]Jin YW, Shang XH. Analysis and prediction of purchase intention of technologically innovative products--taking smart bracelet as an example. Consumer Economy, 2017, 33(01):70-77.
[30]Dodds W B, Monroe K B, Grewal D. Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers' Product Evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research ,1991, 28(3):307-319.
[31]Feng JY, Mu WS, Fu ZT. A Review of Research on Consumers' Willingness to Buy. Modern Management Science,2006(11):7-9.
[32]Zhang Xile, Mao Junquan. The effect of online reviews on consumers' purchase intention - Based on the moderating effect of perceived value. Journal of Economic Research,2022, (07):154-158.
[33]HAN Rui, TIAN Zhilong. A study on the influence of promotion type on consumer perception and behavioral intention. Management Science, 2005, 18(2):85-91.
[34]Bagozzi. R. P, Baumgartner J, Yi Y. An Investigation into the Role of Intentions as Mediators of the Attitude-Behavior Relationship. Journal of Economic Psychology, 1989, 10(1):35-62.
[35]Madahi A, Sukati I. The effect of external factors on purchase intention amongst young generation in Malaysia. International Business Research, 2012, 5(8): 153.
[36]FANG Zheng, YANG Yang. Exploring the research frontiers of product injury crisis and its response. Foreign Economy and Management,2009,31(12):39-44+57.
[37]LIU Hua, SUN Aniu. A study on the impact of product external cues on consumers' purchase intention--Taking cigarette brands as an example. Financial Economy,2014,(22):109-111.
[38]Zhang Weijie. Research on the influence of product's grotesque appearance on consumers' purchase intention. Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,2019.
[39]Chen Li-Qing, Li Wen. Research on the influence of product cues on consumers' purchase intention - mediated by perceived value. Journal of Zhejiang University of Technology (Social Science Edition),2016,36(04):324-332.
[40]HUANG Jing, XU Xinyu, FEI Wei. The effect of color on purchase intention of processed foods: an intuitive relationship between warm color and deliciousness. Journal of Jinan (Philosophy and Social Science Edition),2022,44(03):63-77.
[41]Shi Lihan. Research on the influence of product type on consumers' purchase intention. Yanbian University,2021.
[42]Lim J S, Darley W K. Evaluation of foreign-made products in a limited choice environment: application and extension of the direct mediation model. 2009, 19(1): 96-112.
[43]Shen ZQ, Su DQ. The impact of shopping website promotional message design on consumer shopping behavior: an integrated model of framing effect, moderating focus and promotional timing. Marketing Review, 2014, 11(4):367-389.
[44]Garber L L. The package appearance in choice. Advances in Consumer Research, 1995, 22(1): 653-660.
[45]Snelders D, Hekkert P. Association measures as predictors of product originality.. Advances in Consumer Research, 1999, 26588-593.
[46]Radford S K, Bloch P H. Linking innovation to design: Consumer responses to visual product newness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2011, 28(s1): 208-220.
[47]Landwehr J R, Wentzel D, Herrmann A. Product design for the long run: Consumer responses to typical and atypical designs at different stages of exposure. Journal of Marketing, 2013, 77(5): 92-107.
[48]Zhenzhong Zhu, Xiaojun Li, Fu Liu, et al. The effect of appearance novelty on consumers' purchase intention. The moderating effects of self-construal and product type. Journal of Psychology,2020,52(11):1352-1364.
[49]Griskevicius V, Tybur J M, Van den Bergh B. Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2010, 98(3): 392.