STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
Research on the Evolutionary Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Total Factor Productivity in Wenzhou (2014–2023): A Dual Validation Based on the DEA–Malmquist Index and the Solow Residual Method
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jbm.202609108
Author(s)
Chuting Lin, Weilun Huang*
Affiliation(s)
School of Finance and Trade, Wenzhou Business College, Zhejiang, China *Corresponding Author
Abstract
Total Factor Productivity (TFP) is a core indicator for measuring the quality of regional economic growth. Based on data from the Wenzhou Statistical Yearbook (2014–2023), this paper performs dynamic measurement and structural decomposition of Wenzhou’s TFP using the Solow Residual Method and the DEA-Malmquist Index. The findings reveal that Wenzhou’s TFP level declined over the decade, with an average annual decrease of 2.1%. Economic growth remains significantly dependent on the expansion of capital and labor scales, and an efficiency-driven transformation has yet to be fully realized. Results indicate that stagnant technological progress and deteriorating scale efficiency are the primary causes of the TFP decline, reflecting systemic bottlenecks in Wenzhou regarding translation, industrial structure optimization, and factor allocation. Although the decline has narrowed since 2021 due to digital transformation, the technological adaptability of small and medium-sized enterprises remains weak and the sustainability of efficiency improvements is insufficient. This paper reports that Wenzhou should increase R&D investment, accelerate industrial digitalization, optimize the market-based allocation of factors, and establish a system for talent attraction and cultivation to drive the transition from factor-driven to efficiency-driven economic growth.
Keywords
Total Factor Productivity (TFP); Wenzhou Economy; DEA-Malmquist; Technological Progress; Factor Allocation; High-quality Development
References
[1] Liu, J. C. Research on Chinese total factor productivity: Review and outlook. Technology Economics. 2022, 41 (01): 77-87. [2] Wang, X. L., Fan, G., & Liu, P. Transformation of Chinese economic growth pattern and growth sustainability. Economic Research Journal. 2009, 44 (01): 4-16. [3] Meng, X. Y., Xie, H. B., & Zou, M. T. Have government guiding funds improved the total factor productivity of invested enterprises? -- A test based on the perspective of factor input-output efficiency. South China Finance. 2024 (11): 3-18. [4] Wang, Z. G., Gong, L. T., & Chen, Y. Y. Decomposition of regional production efficiency and total factor productivity growth rate. Social Sciences in China. 2006 (02): 55-66+206. [5] Shi, F. G. Measurement of TFP in Chinese provinces and analysis of influencing factors. Technology Economics. 2012 (05): 13-16. [6] Duan, W. B., & Yin, X. F. A review of research on Chinese total factor productivity. Nankai Economic Studies. 2009 (02): 130-140. [7] Yang, X. L., & Wang, H. Y. Comparative research on total factor productivity of Beijing, Shanghai and Guangdong from the perspective of developing new quality productive forces. Science & Technology Management Research. 2025, 45 (12): 45-57. [8] Lu, T., & Zhou, J. Malmquist index decomposition method introducing semi-fixed inputs. The Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics. 2010, 27 (08): 153-161. [9] Jiang, S. B., Kang, Z., & Cao, S. W. Research on the driving effect of digital economy on high-quality development of circulation industry--Based on DEA-Malmquist index model. Journal of Business Economics. 2025 (21): 5-10. [10]Wang, B., Wu, Y. R., & Yan, P. F. Chinese regional environmental efficiency and environmental total factor productivity growth. Economic Research Journal. 2010, 45 (05): 95-109. [11]Du, Y., & Xu, Y. H. Re-measurement of Chinese TFP growth rate under the background of R&D capitalization. Statistical Research. 2024, 41 (01): 33-45. [12]Xu, Y. H., Deng, M. L., & Liang, P. F. The power of science and technology: Economic growth effect of R&D expenditure. The Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics. 2025:0. [13]Wang, W. F., & Zhang, T. Research on the impact of tax competition on total factor productivity. Journal of Finance and Trade Economics. 2022, 33 (09): 57-66. [14]Wei, S. H., & Wu, T. How local government behavior affects regional total factor productivity--From the perspective of local government platform debt and tax competition level. Finance and Economics. 2024 (03): 134-148. [15]Wu, M., Cao, J., & Mao, J. Local public debt and corporate total factor productivity: Effects and mechanisms. Economic Research Journal. 2022, 57 (01): 107-121. [16]Ye, Z. P., Zheng, J. W., & Li, S. Y. Institutional adaptability and the evolution of regional economic development models--Rethinking the transformation of Wenzhou model. Governance Studies. 2022 (04): 101-110. [17]Yin, Y. Digital finance, industrial agglomeration and total factor productivity. Statistics & Decision. 2022, 38 (07): 131-135. [18]Zhu, H. M., & Li, Z. H. Digital finance and cultivation of new quality productive forces: Internal logic and smooth paths. Development Banking Research. 2025:0. [19]Liu, J. Digital transformation, disruptive innovation and total factor productivity. Technological Economy and Management Research. 2025 (04): 119-126. [20]Huang, Q. H., & Sheng, F. F. New quality productive force system: Factor characteristics, structural bearing and functional orientation. Reform. 2024 (02): 15-24.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved