Design of Waterproof System for Cement Concrete Bridge Deck Pavement Based on Layer Functional Requirements

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jcte.202406223

Author(s)

Bo Shi1, Wei Wang1, Mingpan Liu1, Xue Zhao2, Xian Li3, Fei Yang3,*

Affiliation(s)

1Qing Dao Transportation Development Group Co., Qingdao, Shandong, China 2Shandong Provincial Communications Planning and Design Institute Group Co, Ltd., Jinan, Shandong, China 3Shandong Transportation Institute, Jinan, Shandong, China *Corresponding Author.

Abstract

Currently, there is no unified standard for the design and testing of bridge deck waterproofing systems in China. In the application of waterproofing systems, there are many types of materials to be selected, and the selection of schemes is blind, with varying quality inspection and control standards. Therefore, a unified evaluation system should be determined based on the characteristics of each waterproofing material, combined with usage conditions and construction, to select suitable waterproofing materials, and to optimize the bridge deck waterproofing system based on the AHP analytic hierarchy process. By analyzing the various factors and related indicators that affect the bridge deck pavement waterproof system, a multi-level and multi-index evaluation structure model is established. Relevant experts in the field are used to score the multi-level indicators and evaluate the importance of each indicator. Then, a judgment matrix of each level of indicators is constructed by using the analysis method promoted layer by layer by AHP to calculate its importance and conduct consistency test. Finally determine the importance of each program, to achieve quantitative selection of more reasonable programs.

Keywords

Cement Concrete; Layer Function; Waterproof System; Analytic Hierarchy Process; Gravel Seal

References

[1]You L, You Z, Dai Q, et al. Investigation of adhesion and interface bond strength for pavements underlying chip-seal: Effect of asphalt-aggregate combinations and freeze-thaw cycles on chip-seal. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 203: 322-330. [2]Jinxiang H, Kejin W, Zijia X, et al. Investigation into the freeze–thaw durability of semi-flexible pavement mixtures. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2020, 21(8): 2198-2214. [3]Amir K, Mehdi A, Pooyan A, et al. The fatigue behavior of polymeric sulfur-modified asphalt mixtures subjected to freeze-thaw conditioning. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 2019, 35(4): 089270571988998-089270571988998. [4]Wu S, Yang J, Yang R, et al. Investigation of microscopic air void structure of anti-freezing asphalt pavement with X-ray CT and MIP. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 178: 473-483. [5]Kollmann J, Liu P, Lu G, et al. Investigation of the microstructural fracture behaviour of asphalt mixtures using the finite element method. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 227(C): 117078-117078. [6]Yabo Wang; Zhongshi Pei; Guojun Wang; Yuanqi Zou; Junyan Yi, Study on the influence factors on the design and road performance of high-performance waterproof adhesive material for concrete bridge decks . Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 413: 134838. [7]Pirmohammad S, Kiani A. Study on fracture behavior of HMA mixtures under mixed mode I/III loading. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2016, 153: 80-90. [8]Masad E, Jandhyala V K, Dasgupta N, et al. Characterization of Air Void Distribution in Asphalt Mixes using X-ray Computed Tomography. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2002, 14(2): 122-129.