Analysis of Proppant Transportation and Placement Law in Sand Mixing Process

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jcte.202406214

Author(s)

Shengwei Wang

Affiliation(s)

Chengdu Kangpushen Petroleum Technology Development Co., Ltd, Chengdu, China

Abstract

The study of proppant transport and placement is an important step to help optimize the fracturing design, improve the efficiency of oil and gas extraction, and reduce the environmental risk. In this paper, based on the indoor physical simulation experiments of hydraulic sand fracturing in Surig tight gas reservoir, we analyzed the proppant transport and placement law in the sand mixing process by comparing two sand mixing methods, namely, single grain size and combined ceramic grains, with the sand ratio, displacement, viscosity, and proppant type as the main controlling factors. The results show that single particle size can support the fracture near the wellhead zone in the pre-fracturing stage, and the larger the proppant particle size, the larger the sand ratio, the smaller the discharge, the smaller the viscosity of fracturing fluid, the higher the equilibrium height of sand dike formed in the process of transporting in the fracture. Therefore, in the experimental combined ceramic particles, the larger the proportion of large-size proppant is, the better the inflow ability, and the better the inflow ability would be. Considering the flow-conducting ability and economic cost, it is recommended to use the proppant combination ratio of 100/200 (quartz sand):70/140 (ceramic grains):40/70 (ceramic grains) = 1:3:7 for filling. The results of the study can be used to optimize the proppant formulation in Sourig tight gas reservoirs, to reduce the cost of fracturing operations and to improve the efficiency of hydrocarbon recovery in this type of reservoir.

Keywords

Proppant Transport; Fracture Optimization; Sand Mix Placement; Proppant Formulation; Physical Simulation Experiments

References

[1] Novotny E J .Proppant Transport[M]. 1977. [2] Zhang C .Study on overlying strata caving and movement regularity of ascending mining in contiguous seams[J].Coal Science and Technology, 2018.DOI:10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2018.08.001. [3]Zdunczyk J M .HYDRAULIC FRACTURING SAND[J].Mining Engineering,2020,72(7):56-58. [4] Scheer D , Class H , Flemisch B .Hydraulic Fracturing[M]. 2021. [5] Hu Y , Zhao C , Zhao J ,et al.Experimental apparatus and method for simulating transport of sand-carrying fluid in fracturing fractures: US16746926[P]. US10801312B2[2024-03-22]. [6] Qi W , Yun X , Tengfei W ,et al.The revolution of reservoir stimulation:An introduction of volume fracturing[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2011, 31(4):7-6.DOI:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2011.04.002. [7]Sahai R ,Moghanloo G R .Proppant transport in complex fracture networks – A review[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2019,182106199-106199. [8]Chengdu University of Technology; Researchers Submit Patent Application, Numerical Simulation And Parameter Optimization Method For Volumetric Fracturing Of Unconventional Dual Medium Reservoir, for Approval (USPTO 20200301043)[J].Journal of Mathematics,2020,2291-. [9] Gavassino L .Mapping GENERIC Hydrodynamics into Carter’s Multifluid Theory[J].Symmetry,2024,16(1): [10] A. A C ,A. A A .Regimes of Fluid Displacement from an Anisotropic Formation in the Gravity Field[J].Fluid Dynamics,2024,58(6):1061-1075. [11] Liu J ,Qu X ,Wang J , et al.Investigating the Influencing Factors of Imbibition of Fracturing Fluids in Tight Reservoirs[J].Processes,2024,12(1): [12]Chen Y ,Li J ,Song Q , et al.Research on Flow Patterns of Two-Phase Fracturing Fluid in Hydraulic Fracture Considering the Fluid Leak-off.[J].ACS omega,2024,9(2):2432-2442. [13]Liu J ,Qu X ,Wang J , et al.Investigating the Influencing Factors of Imbibition of Fracturing Fluids in Tight Reservoirs[J].Processes,2024,12(1): [14]Xueping Z ,Youquan L ,Lang Z , et al.Study on Matrix Damage and Control Methods of Fracturing Fluid on Tight Sandstone Gas Reservoirs.[J].ACS omega, 2023,8(40): 37461-37470.