A Comparative Analysis of Evidentiality in L1 And L2 Academic Writings and Its Reflected Identity Construction

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jel.202414313

Author(s)

Li Xin1*, Li Yang2

Affiliation(s)

1School of Foreign Languages and Literature, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China; 2Health Management Center, the Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China. *Corresponding Author.

Abstract

Evidentiality is a linguistic phenomenon in which speakers expose the source of their knowledge and convey their attitudes towards knowledge. Data for our study are composed of written texts including L2 masters’ thesis and L1 published research articles and are analyzed through the software AntConc to explore characteristics of the use of evidentiality and identity construction of L1 and L2 writers. It is found that there is an overall similarity but still considerable disparities between L1 and L2 writers in their specific uses of evidentials. Moreover, due to differences in ways of thinking and cultural consideration, identity constructions by L1 and L2 writers are also different.

Keywords

Evidentiality; Academic Writing; Identity Construction

References

[1] Sapir, E. (1921). Language. An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace &Co. [2] Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In: W. Chafe and J. Nichols, (Eds.), Evidentiality: the linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, N J: Ablex. pp. 261-272. [3] Hu, Z. (1994). Provability, news reporting and argumentative language. Foreign Language Studies, 2, 22-28. [4] Boas, F. (1947). Kwakiutl grammar, with a glossary of the suffixes. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 37:201-377. [5] Yang LX. (2015). Identity construction in English research articles: An evidential perspective. Foreign Language Education, 36(2), 21-25. [6] Wang GF & Yu XY. (2011). A typological study of the evidential in Chinese-English news text. Journal of Xi’an International Studies University, 19(2):30-33. [7] Luo GH & Liao MZ. (2013) Evidentiality in Courtroom Discourse. Studies in Language and Linguistics, 33(4):92-95. [8] Alvesson, M., Lee Ashcraft, K., & Thomas, R. (2008). Identity matters: Reflections on the construction of identity scholarship in organization studies. Organization, 15(1), 5-28. [9] Sveningsson, S., & Larsson, M. (2006). Fantasies of Leadership: Identity Work. Leadership, 2, 203-224. [10] Dickerson, P. (1996). Let me tell us who I am: the discursive construction of viewer identity. European Journal of Communication, 11(1), 57-82. [11] Wooffitt, R. (1992). Telling tales of the unexpected: the organization of factual discourse. Rowman & Littlefield. [12] Brugman, C. M., & Macaulay, M. (2015). Characterizing evidentiality. Linguistic Typology, 19(2), 201-237. [13] Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond Culture. Anchor Books, New York.