STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
A Study on the Identification of Artificial Intelligence-generated Content Works and Copyright Attribution: Taking Sora, a Large Model of Text-generated Video, as an Example
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jel.202414411
Author(s)
Yongqing Wang
Affiliation(s)
China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, China
Abstract
The emergence of a large model of text-generated video, represented by Sora, sheds new light on the identification of works and the discussion of copyright attribution of AI-generated content. Under "anthropocentrism", works protected by copyright law have the requirement of originality, so whether the content generated by AI in text-generated videos meets the requirement of originality is of great significance for the determination of works. In addition, determining the copyright attribution of AI-generated content is conducive to the division of rights and obligations over AI-generated content. Based on the literature research method, this paper argues that as a tool for the creation of human spiritual products, the content generated by the text-generated video big model constitutes a work. And on the issue of copyright attribution, this paper argues that the model of meaning autonomy priority and agreement attribution should be adopted to determine the attribution of copyright.
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content; Text-Generated
References
[1]Wang Q. Is ChatGPT-generated content protected by copyright law?. Exploration and Controversy, 2023, (03):17-20. [2]Sun Zhengliang. Exploration of copyright issues of artificial intelligence-generated content. Tsinghua Law,2019,13(06):190-204. [3]Zhang Huaiyin,Gan Jingyuan. Study on Copyright Attribution of Artificial Intelligence Generated Objects--Who is Eligible to Give Up the Copyright of "Sunshine Lost Glass Window"? . Technology and Law, 2019(3):34-39. [4]FENG Xiaoqing, PAN Baihua. Study on the Recognition of Artificial Intelligence "Creation" and Protection of Its Property Rights and Interests--An Appraisal of the First Copyright Infringement Case of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content. Journal of Northwestern University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition),2020,50(02):39-52. [5]Wu Handong. The question of copyright law for works generated by artificial intelligence. Chinese and foreign law,2020,32(03):653-673. [6]Wang Guozhu. Theory on the Judgment Standard of Objects of Neighboring Rights. Legal Science (Journal of Northwest University of Politics and Law),2018(5):163-172. [7]Yuan Zeng. Review of limited legal personality of artificial intelligence. Oriental Law,2017,(05):50-57. [8]Wang Qian. Revisiting the characterization of AI-generated content in copyright law. Politics and Law Forum,2023,41(04):16-33. [9]Jiang Qiang. Determination of Current News in Copyright Infringement Cases-An Analysis of News Reporting Copyright Infringement Disputes. Science and Law,2011,(03):43-47. [10]Cui Guobin. The dichotomy between picture and content of audiovisual works . Intellectual Property Rights, 2020(5):22-39. [11]Yan Bo. Research on Copyright Issues of Live Broadcast Programs. Beijing: law press, 2016. [12]HE Tao. Reconstruction of short video originality standard. Publishing and Distribution Research,2020,(07):92-96+44. [13]Cheng K H , Tsai C C .Affordances of Augmented Reality in Science Learning: Suggestions for Future Research. Technology, 2012. [14]Elaine Tang. Research on Copyright Issues of Artificial Intelligence Generates// Emerging Rights Collection 2023, Volume 2 - Anthology of Research on Legal Issues of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Southwest University School of Law;,2024:9. [15]Yang Lihua. Exploration of the copyright issue of artificial intelligence generated objects. Modern Law,2021,43(04):102-114. [16]Cong Lixian,Li Yonglin. Copyright Risks of Chatbot-Generated Content and Its Governance--Taking ChatGPT's Application Scenario as a Perspective. China Publishing,2023,(05):16-21. [17]LIU Kaixiang,ZHANG Yunping. Changes in the principle of autonomy and its economic analysis. Chinese and foreign law,1997,(04):70-76. [18]Cong Lixian. Copyrightability and copyright attribution of artificial intelligence-generated content. China Publishing,2019,(01):11-14
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved