STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
The Applicability of the Precautionary Principle in International Investment Disputes: Science, Law, and Human Rights
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jel.202414417
Author(s)
Ruojing Wang
Affiliation(s)
Guanghua Law School, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Abstract
Against the backdrop of deepening globalization, international investment activities have surged, and environmental issues and disputes have become increasingly complex. Discussing the applicability of the precautionary principle will provide new ideas for the resolution of future disputes. This paper adopts a multidimensional analysis method, comprehensively exploring the applicability of the precautionary principle in international investment disputes from the perspectives of science, law, human rights protection, and sustainable development. The advancement of technology has laid a solid foundation for the application of this principle. From the legal perspective, the precautionary principle has been widely adopted by international treaties and domestic legislation. Moreover, it is linked to the obligation to protect human rights and aligns with the goals of achieving sustainable development and maintaining global environmental security. Therefore, the application of the precautionary principle in international investment disputes is necessary.
Keywords
Precautionary Principle; International Law; International Investment; Scientific Uncertainty; International Environment
References
[1] Xiaodong Dou. The Dual Logic of the Compilation of the Ecological Environment Code and Its Development. Chinese Social Sciences, 2024, 3: 146-165. [2] Peng Zhao. The Administrative Law Response to the Risk Society: Centered on the Regulation of Health and Environmental Risks. China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2018: 145-148. [3] Gollier C., N. Treich. Decision-Making Under Scientific Uncertainty: The Economics of the Precautionary Principle. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2003, 27(1):99. [4] WHITESIDE K H. Precautionary politics. Principle andpractice in confronting environmental risk. MIT Press, 2006:145-153. [5] Ting Yu. The Precautionary Principle and Its Application in the Prevention and Control of Air Pollution in China. Environmental Ecology, 2023(5):108. [6] Jiangeng Zhu. A Study on the Precautionary Principle in Marine Environmental Protection. Doctoral Dissertation, China University of Political Science and Law, 2005:11. [7] Hui Jia, "A Study on the State Responsibility for Environmental Protection in International Investment," Doctoral Dissertation, China University of Political Science and Law, 2021: 55. [8] Rubenson S.The Swedish Environmental Code.European Environmental Law Review, 1999 (12) : 328-332. [9] Xi Wang. International Environmental Law. Law Press, 1998:116. [10] Ian Brownlie. Principle of Public International Law. Cambridge University Press, 2003:5. [11] Catherine Tinker, "State responsibility and the Precautionary Principle", in David Freestone and Ellen Hey (eds), The Precautionary Principle and International Law: the Challenge of implementation, Kluwer Law International, 1996:53.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved