Exploration of The Status Quo of Traffic Counterfeiting on Live E-Commerce Platforms and The Path of Regulation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jel.202414609

Author(s)

Yanshu Wang*

Affiliation(s)

China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China *Corresponding Author.

Abstract

As an important part of the e-commerce industry, live e-commerce has skyrocketed in the past few years to become one of the main choices for Internet users to make online purchases. The income of e-commerce anchors, the income of live sales to attract countless people into the live e-commerce industry, some people choose to take a shortcut through the way of traffic counterfeiting to share a cup of live e-commerce. From the live e-commerce platform point of view, traffic counterfeiting is tantamount to drying up and fishing, short-term live broadcasts and platforms to obtain the phenomenon of false traffic prosperity may eventually detract from the consumer's right to know, disrupt the market order, and will eventually backfire on the live broadcasting e-commerce industry itself, which may ultimately lead to the atrophy of the live broadcasting e-commerce industry. Live e-commerce platform as one of the main live e-commerce industry live e-commerce service providers, should give full play to the role of the platform, participate in the governance of the phenomenon of traffic counterfeiting, to promote the industry's healthy and sustainable development.

Keywords

Live E-Commerce; Traffic Counterfeiting; Attention Resources; Platform Regulation; Collaborative Governance

References

[1] Lei Lei, Zhang Xiaobin. Design of Governance Mechanism for False Traffic in Internet Media under the Perspective of Information Economics. Contemporary Communication, 2021(01): 98-101. [2] Liu Qingyong. Blockchain Smart Contract Governance for Digital Advertising Traffic Counterfeiting - A Case Study Based on BAT Platform Application. Global Media Journal, 2021, 8(02): 95-112. [3] Ji Jing. Legal Construction of New Property Interest Form on the Internet--The Perspective of the Proposal of Traffic Confirmation Rules. Zhongguancun, 2019(12): 80-82. [4] Wang Lyric. Facing up to the "traffic" in the New Media Ecology. Young Reporter, 2019(24): 27. [5] Jia Yinsheng. Research on the Core Issues of Criminal Law System for Traffic Counterfeiting. Contemporary Law, 2023, 37(02): 88-99. [6] Herbert A Simon. Designing Organizations for an Information Rich World, in Computers, Communications, and the Public Interest. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1971: 40-41. [7] Wang Yixuan, An Zhenzhen. Attention Economy: Production and Control of Consumer Attention in E-Commerce Live Streaming. China Youth Research,2021(02):14-21. [8] Yu Wenyi. The "Good" and "Evil" of "Traffic is King" - "Quality is King" is the Real "King". Quality is King" is the Real "King Way". People's Forum, 2019(06): 124-126. [9] Sun Guanglei, Han Zhuoxuan. Public Responsibility and Public Value: A Study of Users' Perceptions and Attitudes toward Platform Companies. Future Communication, 2023, 30(03): 81-93. [10] Zhou Shuo. The Legal Responsibility of the Live Broadcasting Platform in the Network Live Streaming with Goods. Law Application, 2022(07): 133-144.