Law and Punishment: Authority, Respect, and Compliance

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jel.202414620

Author(s)

Qian Wang

Affiliation(s)

Beijing 101 Middle School International Department, Beijing, China

Abstract

This article challenges the traditional view that the effectiveness of law is solely dependent on the deterrent power of punishment. It explores why people comply with the law even without the threat of punishment, arguing that respect for the law's authority and moral legitimacy are more significant factors. The essay discusses the authority of law rooted in moral norms and social contract theory, and questions the necessity and morality of punishment. It suggests alternatives to punishment, such as restorative justice and preventive measures, which can achieve similar ends without intentional harm. The conclusion emphasizes that law should be observed due to mutual respect and commitment, which are the foundations of society.

Keywords

Law and Authority; Moral Legitimacy; Punishment Alternatives

References

[1]Austin, J. (1995). The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1832) [2]Bentham, J. (2017). The Principles of Morals and Legislation. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. (Original work published 1780) [3]Boonin, D. (2008). The Problem of Punishment. Cambridge University Press. [4]Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative Justice & Responsive Regulation. Oxford University Press. [5]Ellis, A. (2014). Theories of Punishment. In G. Bruinsma & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. [6]Feng, Z., Ji, N., Luo, Y., et al. (2021). Exploring the influencing factors of public traffic safety awareness in China. Cognitive Technology and Work. [7]Gauthier, D. (1986). Morals by Agreement. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [8]Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2). [9]Hoskins, Z. (2021). Legal Punishment. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford. [10]King, M. L. Jr. (1966). Convocation speech at Illinois Wesleyan University. [11]Kluckhohn, C., & Strodtbeck, F. R. (1961). Variations in Value Orientations. Peterson. [12]Lanni, A. (2021). Taking Restorative Justice Seriously. Buffalo Law Review. [13]Locke, J. (1988). Two Treatises of Government (P. Laslett, Ed.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1689) [14]Morris, H. (1968). Persons and Punishment. The Monist. [15]Morris, N. (1974). The Future of Imprisonment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. [16]Murphy, J. G. (1973). The killing of the innocent. The Monist. [17]Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York, NY: Basic Books. [18]OECD. (2023). Government at a Glance 2024. [19]Renzo, M., & Green, L. (2022). Legal Obligation and Authority. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2022 Edition). [20]Rousseau, J.-J. (1762). The Social Contract. Geneva: Marc-Michel Rey. [21]Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Cultural dimensions of values: Towards an understanding of national differences. In U. Kim et al. (Eds.), Individualism and Collectivism: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Sage. [22]Stephen, J. F., & Warner, S. D. (1993). Liberty, Equality, Fraternity. Liberty Fund. [23]Tamanaha, B. Z. (2004). On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [24]Tamanaha, B. Z. (2017). A Realistic Theory of Law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [25]Tyler, T. R. (2006). Americans: Fairness of Legal Proceedings and the Concept of Equity. Globe Ethics Library. [26]World Bank. (2020). Credit Scoring Approaches Guidelines. [27]Schein, E. H., & Gray, D. (2017). Organizational Culture and Leadership. John Wiley & Sons.