STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
Copyright Filtering Obligations of Algorithmic Recommendation Service Providers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jel.202514106
Author(s)
Yiyang Wu
Affiliation(s)
Law School, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Abstract
Algorithmic recommendation technology is widely used in various Internet industries. However, with the proliferation of user-generated content, the platform is not only providing personalized recommendation services, but also facing increasingly severe copyright infringement problems. This paper aims to explore the copyright filtering obligations of algorithmic recommendation service providers and analyze their legal responsibilities and practical challenges. Filter obligations derived from the lag of copyright infringement liability, is an important way of copyright infringement relief, combined with the relevant provisions of the copyright law, by exploring the practice of filtering mechanism, put forward the filtering obligation of civil relief, pay attention to "advance prevention + stop infringement", can promote the benign development of algorithm recommended technology and effectively respond to the regulation of the Internet industry.
Keywords
Algorithm Recommendation; Service Provider; Filtering Obligations; Copyright Infringement
References
[1] Li Wenbo. The obligation expansion path of network service providers in the algorithmic era. Electronic Intellectual Property Rights, 2023 (11): 42-50. [2] Shao Honghong. Explore the copyright duty of care of algorithm recommendation service providers. Journal of Soochow University (Law edition), 2023, 10 (01): 26-39. [3] Cao Shuaishuai. Analysis of copyright filtering obligation rules of short video industry in Web3.0 era. Journal of Yangtze River Normal University, 2024, 40 (01): 78-85. [4] Wan Yong. Chinese selection of mandatory filtering mechanism of copyright law. Legal Research, 2021, 38 (06): 184-196. [5] Liu Jianhua, Zhang Junfa. Copyright "algorithm filtering" by China selection. Times Law, 2024, 22 (03): 63-72. [6] Liu Youhua, Li Yangfan. Law Journal, 2023, 44 (03): 138-156. [7] Tao Qian. Application scenarios of "safe haven rules" and filtering obligations for short video platforms. Published in China, 2022 (08): 66-69. [8] Zhang Yang. Construction of copyright filtering obligations under the algorithm recommendation. Modern Law, 2023, 45 (04): 75-89. [9] Xiong Qi, Zhang Zhihan. Exploration of the private creation path of copyright filtering mechanism in the algorithm era. Digital Rule of Law, 2023 (04): 40-57. [10] Xiong Qi. Multiple properties of copyright filtering mechanism. Law, 2023 (07): 121-133.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved