STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
Function Optimization and Regulation of Relevant Organs in Environmental Administrative Public Interest Litigation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jel.202514107
Author(s)
Kaibo Fu
Affiliation(s)
Law School, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
Abstract
Environmental administrative public interest litigation refers to a system in which the procuratorate may take measures to file an administrative lawsuit with the court to protect the environmental public interest when the environmental public interest is infringed upon or is likely to be infringed by a specific administrative act of an administrative agency. At present, the number of environmental administrative public interest litigation cases in China has shown the characteristics of blowout growth, but there are also many problems to be solved behind this growth. In the pre litigation procedure, the content of the procuratorial recommendations of the procuratorial organ is inappropriate, so the content of the procuratorial recommendations should be optimized to ensure its details and Appropriateness; In the process of litigation, the procuratorial organ has a tendency of self-interest, which damages the fairness of justice, so it should take some regulatory measures. On the other hand, the court has the problem of generalizing the content of the judgment, which needs to be clarified in detail; In the implementation process, the procuratorial organs' supervision over the implementation of administrative organs is insufficient.
Keywords
State Organs; Environmental Administrative Public Interest Litigation; Functional Optimization; Regulation
References
[1] Li Yisong, ZHANG Kemeng. On the determination of the standard of "failure to perform duties in accordance with the law" in the pre-litigation procedure of environmental administrative public interest litigation. Administration and Law, 2023, (10):56. [2] Chen Zhuozhu. Research on the optimization path of pre-litigation procedures for environmental administrative public interest litigation. China Brand and Anti-counterfeiting, 2025, (02):126. [3] Xu Quanbing. Functional positioning and system construction of procuratorial organs initiating administrative public interest litigation. Journal of Administrative Law, 2017, (05):81. [4] Wang Mingyuan. On the development direction of environmental public interest litigation in China: an analysis based on the theory of the relationship between administrative power and judicial power. China Law Science, 2016, (01):50. [5] Wei Haoguo, Jiang Luxia. Promoting administrative public interest litigation for the purpose of "public interest protection". People's Procuratorate, 2023, (S1):139. [6] Chen Haisong, ZhangXin. Journal of Hohai University (Philosophy and Social Science), 2025, 27(01):27. [7] Hou Zhiqiang, Wang Hong. Re-understanding the Role of Administrative Organs in Environmental Public Interest Civil Litigation. Environmental Protection, 2021, (7):67. [8] Xiong Chao. The construction of the mechanism of the list of responsibilities for the performance of the responsibilities of the ecological and environmental departments in China: Based on the background of the vertical management reform of the environmental protection departments. Academic Forum, 2020, 43(05):47. [9] Yang Yani. The relationship between judicial power and administrative power in environmental public interest civil litigation. Journal of Beijing University of Administration, 2023, (3):115. [10] Zhang Hui. On the Enforcement of Environmental Public Interest Litigation Judgments: Follow-up Attention to "Sky-high" Environmental Public Interest Litigation Cases. Legal Forum, 2016, (5):88.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved