A Study on the Legal and Standard Nature of Special Equipment Safety Technical Specifications

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jel.202514117

Author(s)

Yang Bai*

Affiliation(s)

China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China *Corresponding Author.

Abstract

Special equipment safety technical specifications, formulated by administrative authorities as mandatory documents, face persistent ambiguities in their legal and standard nature, complicating practical implementation. This study contrasts their enforceability with legal norms and mandatory standards, revealing that while not inherently legal, these specifications logically extend from legal frameworks and align technically with mandatory standards. By disentangling and integrating their dual attributes, the research clarifies their role in enhancing regulatory systems and harmonizing technical and legal requirements. Empirical analysis of cases, such as the Shanghai escalator accident and Hubei power plant incident, demonstrates how conflation with legal norms or standards leads to enforcement challenges. The paper proposes structural reforms, including "hard-soft separation" to streamline specifications and mechanisms inspired by the U.S. NTTAA to improve coordination. These recommendations aim to resolve hierarchical conflicts, ensure adaptability to technological advancements, and strengthen safety governance. This work contributes theoretical insights and actionable strategies for refining China's special equipment regulatory framework.

Keywords

Special Equipment; Safety Technical Specifications; Mandatory Standards

References

[1] Wei Ji, Fangyuan Li, Rethinking and Analyzing the Concept of "Market Regulation": Safety, Order, and Technical Norms. China Administrative Management. 2023 (03): 119-125. [2] Hualin Song, Diversified roles in the process of rule making: a discussion centered on the field of technical standards. Zhejiang Academic Journal. 2007 (03): 160-165. [3] E. Bodenheimer, Jurisprudence, Legal Philosophy, and Legal Methods. China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2004: 347-348. [4] Hualin Song, On the Legal Nature of Technical Standards - Positioning from the Perspective of Administrative Law Normative System. Administrative Law Research, 2008 (03), 36-42. [5] Jingwei Liu, The Normality and Normative Effect of Standards: A Perspective on the Protection of Standard Copyright. Law Journal, 2014 (08): P101. [6] Jingshen Li, Preliminary Exploration of Technical Standards and Their Legal Nature [J]. Legal and Social, 2012(08): 256-257. [7] Wei Chen, As a normative technical standard and its relationship with law. Chinese Journal of Law, 2022 (05): 84-100. [8] Jun Chen, Jingwei Liu, Mandatory standards are still in their true form: from the perspective of distinguishing standards from law. Standard Science, 2024 (03): 4-15. [9] Tian Mao, Feirong Peng, Revisiting the Copyright of Standards. Standard Science, 2022 (12): 51-56. [10] Liao Li, Cheng Hong, Research on the Integration Mode of Law and Standards: Based on the Perspectives of Hard Law and Soft Law and Chinese Practice. Chinese Soft Science, 2013(07):164-176. [11] Jia Li, Nana Niu, The Relationship between Technical Regulations and Standards in the United States and Their Implications for China. Standard Science,2022 (12), 44-50.