STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
On the Nature and Forms of Directors' Liability to Third Parties: Centered around Article 191 of the New Company Law
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jel.202514502
Author(s)
Shuyi Li
Affiliation(s)
Faculty of law, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Abstract
The newly revised Article 191 of the Company Law establishes a liability system for directors towards third parties, but there is still controversy over the nature and form of liability. From the perspective of regulatory purposes, this system is designed to prevent directors from abusing their power and acting recklessly, which could harm the interests of the company and its creditors. In legal terms, the liability of directors to third parties is a moderate expansion of the fiduciary duty theory and the legal entity theory based on the concept of equity in specific contexts. Therefore, in terms of liability composition, the liability of directors to third parties should be stricter in subjective fault, causality, and other aspects compared to general tort liability. Given this, it should be classified as special tort liability rather than general tort liability. In the process of institutional construction, in order to achieve the value choice of mainly compensating for the losses of third parties and supplemented by reasonable punishment, the form of liability should be designed with a gradient of joint liability and supplementary liability according to the different circumstances of the damage, and the scope of liability should be reasonably limited according to the situation.
Keywords
Directors' Liability to Third Parties; Special Tort Liability; Joint Responsibility; Supplementary Liability
References
[1]Lu Daifu & Cao Yang. International Experience and Theoretical Framework of Company Law. Law Press China, 2005. [2]Zou Hailin. Directors' Obligations and Responsibility Allocation under Company Law. Journal of Law Application 2024. 2: 55. [3]C.Graham & W.King. Extending Fiduciary Principles to the Director-Creditor relationship: Canadian Perspective. Manitoba Law Journal, 2002, 29: 243-276. [4]Abe Herzberg & Helen Anderson. Stepping Stones-From Corporate Fault to Directors’ Personal Civil Liability. Federal Law Review, 2012, 40: 204-205. [5]Guo Fuqing. Triple Reflection on the Establishment of Directors' Civil Liability to Third Parties in China's Company Law. Legal Science (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law), 2024, 1:157. [6]Wang Changhua, Re understanding of the theory of corporate legal entity: from the perspective of directors' responsibility to third parties. Law Science Magazine, 2020, 6:52-53. [7]Ma Junju & Yu Yanman. The Theory of Civil Law. Law Press·China, 2005. [8]Wang Liming. Research on Tort Law. China Renmin University Press, 2004. [9]Li Dongyang, On the Liability of Directors to Third Parties -- Focusing on Article 190 of the Company Law (Revised Draft). Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 1:117.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved