STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
The Protection of the Rights and Interests of Gig Economy Practitioners: An Analysis of the Responsibility Boundaries of Digital Platforms
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jel.202514529
Author(s)
Bingcheng Chen
Affiliation(s)
Jinan Foreign Language School, Jinan, Shandong, China
Abstract
This article focuses on the issue of the responsibility boundaries of digital platforms in the protection of the rights and interests of gig economy practitioners. By analyzing the characteristics of the gig economy and the current situation of protecting the rights and interests of practitioners, this paper explores the responsibility boundaries of digital platforms from three aspects: labor rights and interests, social security, and career development. It points out the current challenges such as lagging laws, regulatory predicaments, and platform profit-driven nature, and proposes countermeasures such as improving laws and regulations, building a collaborative supervision mechanism, and strengthening the social responsibility awareness of platforms. It aims to provide theoretical support and practical paths for safeguarding the rights and interests of gig economy practitioners and promoting the healthy development of the gig economy.
Keywords
Gig Economy; Digital Platform; Responsibility Boundary; Protection of Practitioners' Rights and Interests
References
[1] Xu, Z. (2022). The gig economy in China. The Routledge handbook of the gig economy, 392-400. [2] Xiao, S. (2019). Understanding the employment status of gig-workers in China's sharing economy era–an empirical legal study. Asian Journal of Law and Economics, 10(3), 20190019. [3] Woodcock, J., & Graham, M. (2019). The gig economy: A critical introduction. [4] Rahman, S. U., Sultan, M. S., & Tabassam, A. (2024). The impact of the gig economy on traditional employment and the necessity for revised business, HR, and legal strategies. Pakistan Journal of International Affairs, 7(1), 108-126. [5] Hickson, J. (2024). Freedom, domination and the gig economy. New Political Economy, 29(2), 321-336. [6] Tripathi, M. A., Tripathi, R., Yadav, U. S., & Shastri, R. K. (2022). Gig Economy: A paradigm shift towards Digital HRM practices. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(2). [7] Williams, P., McDonald, P., & Mayes, R. (2023). Recruitment in the gig economy: Attraction and selection on digital platforms. In Technologically mediated human resource management (pp. 142-168). Routledge. [8] Friedman, G. (2014). Workers without employers: shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy. Review of Keynesian economics, 2(2), 171-188.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved