Situational Reconstruction of "High-Level, Innovative, and Challenging" Standards in the Digital Intelligence Era: The Construction Logic of the Farmer Entrepreneurship Practice Course

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jel.202614201

Author(s)

Xiaoyun Wu*

Affiliation(s)

College of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hainan Open University, Haikou, Hainan, China *Corresponding Author

Abstract

Traditional farmer entrepreneurship education is deeply entangled in a structural disconnect between the "High-Level, Innovative, and Challenging" curriculum standards and the inherent uncertainty of entrepreneurial practice. This paper, grounded in adult learning theory and the effectuation perspective, conducts an in-depth analysis of four core deficiencies in the Farmer Entrepreneurship Practice course: the tendency to reduce objectives to "skill-based" outcomes, "urban-centric" content, "lecture-based" processes, and "paper-based" evaluation. It proposes a four-in-one construction model encompassing "objective reconstruction - content integration - process reengineering - evaluation transformation." "High-level" is reconceptualized as the systemic integration capability of local resources, digital intelligence technologies, and market logic. "Innovative" is reconceptualized as the ability to create entrepreneurial opportunities under resource constraints. "Challenging" is reconceptualized as dynamic cognitive adaptability within authentic entrepreneurial contexts. Digital intelligence technologies, functioning as an ecological enabler, deeply empower the entire course construction process through intelligent profiling, virtual-real integration, and data tracking. This provides a systematic theoretical reference and practical pathway for developing first-class farmer entrepreneurship education courses in agricultural universities, and establishes a replicable and scalable curriculum development paradigm for cultivating high-quality farmers within the rural revitalization strategy.

Keywords

High-Level; Innovative; and Challenging; Effectuation; Farmer Entrepreneurship Practice; Digital Intelligence Era; Situational Reconstruction

References

[1] Zhao Lifang, Long Haijun. Definition and Dimensional Identification of the Vulnerability of Returning Farmers’ Entrepreneurship. Journal of Western Economic Management Forum, 2022, 33(05): 15-24. [2] Li Guozhi, Luo Hui, Hu Huiyong, et al. Research on Vocational Farmer Training Models and Their Main Problems under the Background of Rural Revitalization. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2023, 17(01): 35-41. [3] Mou Zhijia, Yue Ting, Su Fugen. How Can Digital Intelligence Technologies Empower Personalized Learning: An Exploration Based on a Systematic Literature Review. Modern Educational Technology, 2025, 35(11): 79-88. [4] Zhong Qiquan. From “Knowledge-Based” to “Competency-Based”: The Challenging Task of Curriculum Reform. Basic Education Curriculum, 2021(11): 5-20. [5] Malcolm Knowles. Modern Practice of Adult Education. Translated by Lin Tingzi. Beijing: People’s Education Press, 1989: 120-125. [6] Wang Jingyi. Analysis of New-Type Vocational Farmer Training and Optimization Pathways under the Background of Rural Revitalization. Modern Agriculture, 2026(02): 59-63. [7] Zhang Jingwei, Du Xin, Tian Zhikai, Li Zhigang. How Effectuation and Causation Logics Function in the Business Model Construction Process: A Multi-Case Study of Internet Startups. Nankai Business Review, 2021, 24(04): 27-40. [8] Xu Chunmei, Lv Limin. The Value Implication, Theoretical Logic, and Pathway Selection of Cultivating High-Quality Farmers under the Background of Building an Educational Powerhouse. Vocational and Technical Education Forum, 2025, 41(08): 75-81. [9] Chen Li, Xu Yaqian. The Philosophy of Connectivism and Its Implications for Educational Transformation. Educational Research, 2023, 44(01): 16-25. [10] Cui Yunhuo, Wang Zhongnan. How Learning Occurs: An Interpretation of Situated Learning Theory. Educational Science Research, 2012(07): 28-32. [11] Cui Yunhuo. Promoting Learning: A New Paradigm for Academic Evaluation. Educational Science Research, 2010(03): 1-15+20.