STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
Securities Regulatory Coordination in Pre-Reorganization Procedures of Listed Companies
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jel.202614202
Author(s)
Xiyang Li
Affiliation(s)
School of Law, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, China
Abstract
As credit risk exposure accelerates in China’s A-share market, pre-reorganization has emerged as a prominent mechanism for resolving the debt crises of listed companies. Yet pre-reorganization remains outside the statutory framework of the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law, and its foundational logic of confidential negotiation stands in structural tension with the mandatory disclosure regime of the Securities Law. This article examines the securities regulatory coordination challenges arising in listed company pre-reorganization from three dimensions: information disclosure, insider trading regulation, and trading suspension and resumption arrangements. It identifies a triple dilemma: the absence of disclosure rules tailored to each phase of pre-reorganization, the difficulty of identifying and controlling insider information generated during the process, and the lack of unified standards for trading suspension and resumption. Drawing on a comparative analysis of the dual-track constraint model under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and the SEC regulatory framework, as well as the delayed disclosure and principles-based regulatory dialogue mechanisms in the United Kingdom, this article extracts three foundational principles — persistent yet flexible disclosure obligations, continuous application of anti-fraud rules with permissible information sharing under institutional safeguards, and non-suspension as the default — and translates them into context-specific institutional proposals for China. Specifically, it advocates a three-tier disclosure framework comprising trigger-based, deferred, and supplementary disclosure; a strengthened insider trading regime with defined formation points, an expanded scope of insiders, and mandatory information barriers; a flexibilized suspension mechanism conditioned on prior disclosure compliance; and a court–securities regulator notification and early-intervention coordination mechanism. These proposals aim to reconcile the confidentiality imperatives of pre-reorganization with the transparency demands of securities regulation through a phased, elastic, and supervisable set of coordinating rules.
Keywords
Pre-Reorganization; Listed Companies; Securities Regulation; Information Disclosure; Insider Trading; Trading Suspension and Resumption; Regulatory Coordination
References
[1] Xu Yangguang. Research on Legal Regulation of Pre-Reorganization of Distressed Enterprises. Law and Business Studies (Fashang Yanjiu), 2021(3): 67–79. [2] Yang Zhipeng. A Typological Construction of the Application of Bankruptcy Preservation in Chinese-Style Pre-Reorganization. Jingchu Law Review (Jingchu Faxue), 2023(6): 41–52. [3] Zhang Shijun, Zheng Xia. Legal Identification of Reorganization Value of Bankrupt Enterprises. Journal of Law Application (Falv Shiyong), 2023(10). [4] Zhang Qinyu. Misunderstandings and Corrections in the Application of Bankruptcy Composition Procedures to Listed Companies. Securities Law Review (Zhengquan Fayuan), 2022(2): 4–21. [5] Jared A. Ellias. Bankruptcy Law’s Knowns and Unknowns. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2023, 19: 319–335. [6] Adam J. Levitin. Judge Shopping in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy. University of Illinois Law Review, 2023: 351–418. [7] Xu Yangguang, Wu Shimin. Corporate Rescue Culture and the Development of Bankruptcy Law: An Analysis Based on the Latest Reforms of UK Insolvency Law. Journal of Shanxi University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 44(1): 115–123. [8] Jared A. Ellias, Elisabeth de Fontenay. The Credit Markets Go Dark. Yale Law Journal, 2025, 134: 696–774. [9] Gao Simin. The Metrics-Based Approach to Bankruptcy Law and Its Critique: Taking the World Bank “Resolving Insolvency” Indicator as an Example. Chinese Journal of Law (Faxue Yanjiu), 2021(2): 193–208. [10] Bao Dingyurui. On the Powers and Supervision of Debtor-in-Possession in Reorganization Proceedings. Journal of China University of Political Science and Law (Zhongguo Zhengfa Daxue Xuebao), 2021(4): 130–154. [11] Jared A. Ellias, George G. Triantis. The Administrative State in Bankruptcy. DePaul Law Review, 2023, 72(2): 371–416.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved