From "Consultation" to "Empowerment"-A Study on the Effectiveness and Guarantee Mechanism of Public Participation in Environmental Decision-Making

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jel.202614206

Author(s)

Kai Chen

Affiliation(s)

East China University of Political Science and Law, HangZhou, Zhejiang, China

Abstract

Currently, most public participation in China's environmental decision-making remains at the "consultation" stage, thus failing to exert a substantive impact on administrative decisions. From the perspective of the "Spectrum of Public Participation," the levels of participation can naturally be divided into four tiers: "Inform-Consult-Involve-Empower." The root cause of current practices being stuck at the lower stages is precisely the absence of "procedural justice" elements. Therefore, using procedural justice as a theoretical framework, this paper conducts a systematic theoretical analysis of typical cases in the fields of environmental impact assessment (EIA) and planning, clearly proposing two objectives: First, to establish evaluation criteria for examining the effectiveness of public participation from the aspects of participation timing, information transparency, interactivity of consultation, and feedback on opinions. Second, to derive specific pathways for optimizing the dynamic mechanism, information mechanism, and communication-feedback mechanism. The research draws a clear and robust conclusion: The fundamental reasons for participation failure can be summarized as insufficient guarantees at the "procedural" level, contextual constraints at the "structural" level, and lagging concepts at the "paradigm" level. More importantly, drawing on the international experience of the Aarhus Convention and the domestic practice of the Institute of Public & Environmental Affairs (IPE), this paper proposes a set of integrated guarantee mechanisms encompassing legal safeguards, procedural guarantees, capacity building, and supervision and remedies. The final logic is rigorous: only by implementing procedural justice and shifting the participation model from one-way consultation to two-way collaboration and empowered co-governance can the public be truly transformed from passive objects of consultation to active collaborators, thereby achieving a genuine unity of democracy and scientific validity in environmental decision-making.

Keywords

Component; Public Participation; Environmental Decision-Making; Procedural Justice; Guarantee Mechanism.

References

[1] Wang, J. (2004). Research on Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment Procedures--Also on the Implementation of Relevant Provisions of China's "Environmental Impact Assessment Law". Law Review, 22(2), 107-118. [2] Qi, J. G. (2009). The Legitimacy of the Risk Regulation Process: From the Perspective of Public and Expert Risk Knowledge Application. Studies in Law and Business, (5), 49-59. [3] Qi, J. G. (2014). Reflections on China’s Administrative Decision Risk Assessment System. Jurisprudence, (10), 92–98. [4] Qi, J. G., & Lan, H. H. (2021). The Dilemma of Environmental Governance Tool Selection in China and Its Overcoming: From the Perspective of Collaborative Governance. Theoretical Investigation, (6). [5] Li, Y. F. (2001). The Public Participation System in U.S. Environmental Impact Assessment. Environmental Protection, (10), 33-34. [6] Li, Y. F. (2004). Legal System Construction for Public Participation in Environmental Protection: Centered on Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs). Zhejiang Social Sciences, (2), 85-90. [7] Li, Y. F. (2004). On the Information Disclosure System in Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment. Jianghai Academic Journal, (1), 126-132. [8] The Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China. (2020). Administrative Ruling (2020) No. 1797 [EB/OL]. China Judgments Online. Retrieved February 16,2026,from https://wenshu.court.gov.cn/website/wenshu/181107ANFZ0BXSK4/index.html?docId=wxS4h485yWsr7bVNr3CHKNX4AIwQIqmLWr0dr7lfkKa8hOiCApRcSWI3IS1ZgB82JiB/ZrIG2JglZ0vrCF+eb3j2YFQzSYVnHNw+u3rzb/1r5EXsZPH0UeX1OelKbNTx [9] Jin, Z. N., & Liu, L. H. (2017). Improving the Judicial Review Mechanism for Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment. Academic Journal of Zhongzhou, (2), 57–60.