Research on the Legal Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in Administrative Penalties
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jel.202614219
Author(s)
Kaiwen Zhang
Affiliation(s)
School of law, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Abstract
With the continuous development of science, technology, and artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence has gradually been applied in different fields, including the field of administrative law enforcement. This paper focuses on administrative penalty acts and explores the interactive application of artificial intelligence in administrative penalties. The introduction of artificial intelligence technology provides new ideas and methods for administrative penalties. Meanwhile, due to the particularity of artificial intelligence, certain problems also exist in its application. This paper discusses the problems of artificial intelligence in the field of administrative penalties from different application scenarios and explores future development paths, such as improving the legal regulatory system, enhancing the level of technical support, and constructing a multi-party collaborative supervision mechanism, with a view to accelerating the process of intelligent penalties and ultimately realizing the integration of artificial intelligence and administrative law enforcement.
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence; Administrative Penalties; Intelligent Application
References
[1] Feng Zixuan. The Process Mechanism and Conflict Adaptation of Intelligent Administrative Enforcement. Administrative Law Review, 2022, (06):75-85.
[2] Li Gang, Li Yuanyuan. Technology Assists Environmental Legal System Construction — Nanjing Explores Establishing a Scientific Discretion Benchmark System for Administrative Penalties. Environmental Protection, 2009, (21):58-60.
[3] Han Yi, Zhang Ting. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Administrative Penalties and Its Boundary Considerations. Administration and Law, 2022, (05):77-84.
[4] [UK] Viktor Mayer-Schönberger, Kenneth Cukier. Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. Translated by Sheng Yangyan, Zhou Tao. Hangzhou: Zhejiang People's Publishing House, 2014: 197.
[5] Liu Xing. Technical Control in Administrative Discretion — Practical Observation Based on Government Service Application Scenarios. Public Administration Review, 2022, 15(01):51-68+197.
[6] Wei Qiong, Xu Junhui. Risk Governance of Artificial Intelligence Applied to Penalties. Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law, 2020, (5):86.
[7] See Brauneis R and Goodnman E P, "Algorithmic Transparency for the Smart Ciy". Yale Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 20, 2018, pp.103-176.
[8] Citron, Danielle Keats. "Technological due process." Wash. UL Rev. 85 (2007): 1249.
[9] Xing Huiqiang. Legal Regulation of Face Recognition. Comparative Law Research, 2020, (05):51-63.
[10] Zhao Long. Inclusive Regulation of Automated Administrative Discretion. Administrative Law Review, 2025, (01):53-66.