STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
Charity Organizations’ Legal Governance of For-Profit Activities
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jel.202614321
Author(s)
Yarui Liu
Affiliation(s)
School of politics and law, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, Shandong China.
Abstract
With the continuous development of charitable sector, it has become increasingly common for charity organizations to engage in for-profit activities. While this trend provides stable funding sources for organizations, it also brings risks of straying from public welfare purposes. Currently, China’s charity organizations face prominent challenges in their for-profit operations, including vague definition of such activities, inadequate regulatory mechanisms and insufficient tax policy incentives, which have led to declining public trust and sharp reductions in donations. By analyzing typical cases such as the Guo Meimei’s display of weatlth, the Song Qingling Foundation’s regulatory practices, and Li Yapeng’s foundation regulatory violations, this thesis thoroughly explores the risks and root causes arising from charity organizations’ for-profit activities. At the same time, drawing on advanced experience of the United States and the United Kingdom in governing charity organizations’ for-profit operations, this thesis proposes specific recommendations for improving China’s legal governance system for charity organizations’ commercial behaviors from three dimensions: clarifying the definition of commercial activities, strengthening the regulatory system and optimizing tax policies. Establishing a scientific and sound legal regulation system is the core to promote the healthy development of charitable organizations.
Keywords
Charity Organizations; For-profit Activities; Legal Governance; Supervision Mechanism; Tax Policy
References
[1]Dana Brakman Reiser. Charity Law’s Essentials. Notre Dame Law Review, 2011, 86(1):1. [2]Jaclyn Cherry. Charitable Organizations and Commercial Activity: A New Era - Will the Social Entrepreneurship Movement Force Change. Journal of Business Entrepreneurship & Law, 2012, 5(2). [3]Matthew Harding. Charity and Law: Past, Present and Future. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 2020:564. [4]Li D J. Research on UK Charity Law. Jinan: Shandong University, 2016. [5]Yang D B. Legal Regulation of For-Profit Activities of Public Welfare Social Organizations. Tribune of Political Science and Law, 2011, 29(4):156-162. [6]Wang H Y. Primary Research on Rule of Law for Public Charity Organizations Engaging in Commercial For-Profit Activities. Theoretical Monthly, 2015(10):165-171. [7]Zhou Z F. Legal Reflections on the Commercialization of Charities. Journal of Hubei University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2013, 40(1):93-97. [8]Chen X. Research on Improvement Path of Legal System of Tax Preference for China’s Philanthropy. Jinan: Shandong University of Finance and Economics, 2024. [9]Wen C. Basic Supervision Practices of Foreign Charity Organizations. Study Monthly, 2011(11):31. [10]Adler. A Guide to American Charity Law. Trans. NPD Information Consulting Center. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2002:4. [11]Hansmann H. The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise. Yale Law Journal, 1980, 89(5):835-901. [12]Morgan G G. Charitable Incorporated Organisations: An Analysis of the Three UK Jurisdictions. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 2015, 6(1):25-44. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2014-0035. [13]Huang C L, Guo X H. Charity Commercialization: International Experience and Development Path Design for China. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2015(4):34-44. [14]Wang S N. Challenges and Countermeasures of Supervision Mechanism of Public Offering Charity Organizations in China. Administrative Reform, 2024(8):61-71. [15]Zhang Y. Research on Tax Regulation of For-Profit Income of Public Welfare Organizations. Chongqing: Southwest University of Political Science and Law, 2023.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved