STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
An Empirical Analysis Focusing on China's A-Share Listed Firms Examines how the Threat of Short-Selling Mechanisms Influences Corporate Spending on Environmental Protection Initiatives
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jel.202614415
Author(s)
Jiabin Liang
Affiliation(s)
School of Finance and Economics, Guangdong Neusoft University, Foshan, Guangdong, China
Abstract
Focusing on Chinese A-share listed firms as the sample, this study empirically explores how the short-selling mechanism affects corporate environmental protection expenditure. After reviewing relevant academic studies, researchers put forward hypotheses and establish an econometric model, then conduct empirical investigations using panel data spanning from 2013 to 2022. The findings indicate that the short-selling mechanism can effectively drive firms to enhance their environmental protection expenditure, and this effect demonstrates differences across enterprises with varying ownership structures, industrial characteristics, and regional environmental regulatory intensities. Further analysis reveals that the short-selling mechanism exerts an influence on corporate environmental decision-making mainly by improving the transparency of information disclosure and strengthening market supervision. Consequently, this research not only expands the existing body of academic work in this domain but also offers practical guidance for optimizing short-selling regulations and facilitating enterprises' transition towards greener operations. The analysis focuses on several critical factors influencing the relationship between corporate environmental protection initiatives and market dynamics. These include the operational mechanism of short-selling activities, which can impose significant pressure on firms to enhance their performance. Additionally, the study examines how external regulatory forces and public scrutiny affect a company's decisions regarding environmental investments. Another key aspect is the role played by information transparency, as clear and accessible disclosure practices can influence investor perceptions and market efficiency. Finally, the impact of market supervision systems on enforcing compliance with environmental standards is also explored.
Keywords
Short-Selling Mechanisms; Corporate Environmental Protection Investment; External Governance; Capital Market Discipline; Information Transparency
References
[1] MILLER E M. Risk, uncertainty, and divergence of opinion [J]. The Journal of Finance, 1977, 32 (4): 1151-1168. [2] KARPOFF J M, LOU X. Short sellers and financial misconduct [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2010, 99 (1): 114-129. [3] SAFFI P A C, SIGURDSSON K. Price efficiency and short selling [J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2011, 24 (3): 821-852. [4] PORTER M E, KRAMER M R. Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2006, 84 (12): 78-92. [5] ZHANG Y, LI Y, LIU X. Environmental regulation and corporate environmental investment: Evidence from China [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 231: 1343-1352. [6] HOU K, ROBINSON D T. Industry concentration and average stock returns [J]. The Journal of Finance, 2006, 61 (4): 1927-1956. [7] HOPE O K, HU D, LU H. Short selling and earnings management: A controlled experiment [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2012, 54 (2-3): 149-165. [8] MASSA M, ZHANG B, ZHANG H. The invisible hand of short selling: Does short selling discipline earnings management?[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2015, 28 (7): 1969-2003. [9] FANG V W, HUANG A H, KARPOFF J M. Short selling and earnings management: A longitudinal study [J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 2016, 54 (5): 1263-1304. [10] Li Yang, Zhang Lin. Short-selling pressure, stock price information content, and corporate investment efficiency [J]. Financial Research, 2015(3):156–172. [11] Chen Jun, Hong Hao, Stein J. C. Equity breadth and stock returns [J]. World Economy, 2002(8):71–85. [12] BOEHMER E, JONES C M, ZHANG X. Which shorts are informed?[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2008, 63 (2): 491-527. [13] DIETHER K B, LEE K H, WERNER I M. Short-sale strategies and return predictability [J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2009, 22 (2): 575-607. [14] CHRISTOPHE S E, FERRI M G, HSIEH J. Short-selling prior to earnings announcements [J]. Journal of Finance, 2010, 59 (4): 1845-1876. [15] DESAI H, KRISHNAMURTHY S, VENKATARAMAN K. Do short sellers target firms with poor earnings quality? Evidence from earnings restatements [J]. Review of Accounting Studies, 2006, 11 (1): 71-90.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved