Ecological Resilience Assessment Model for Airport Cargo Terminals

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jes.202502106

Author(s)

Han Xia

Affiliation(s)

Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China

Abstract

This paper introduces a framework for assessing ecological resilience in airport cargo terminals, which are vital nodes in the air cargo logistics chain. These terminals encounter both external and internal disruptions, such as natural disasters, economic fluctuations, and public health crises. These challenges necessitate the enhancement of terminal resilience to ensure stable, efficient operations. The concept of ecological resilience, borrowed from ecosystem theory, is applied to assess the ability of airport cargo terminals to withstand and recover from disruptions. This research proposes a comprehensive framework that evaluates resilience across multiple dimensions: preparedness, resistance, recovery, and adaptability. A Bayesian network model is employed to quantitatively assess the ecological resilience of a selected airport cargo terminal. Through empirical analysis and sensitivity testing, key factors influencing resilience, such as personnel management and operational recovery, are identified. The results highlight the significant impact of preparedness and management on improving terminal resilience. This framework provides a valuable tool for airport managers to make informed decisions, ultimately enhancing the long-term stability and competitiveness of the air cargo industry.

Keywords

Ecological Resilience; Airport Cargo Terminal; Resilience Assessment Framework; Bayesian Network; Logistics; Preparedness; Recovery; Adaptability; Operational Resilience

References

[1]Danyluk M. Supply-chain urbanism: constructing and contesting the logistics city. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2021, 111(7): 2149-2164. [2]Samunderu E. The Scope of the Global Aviation Industry//The Economic Effects of Air Transport Market Liberalisation: A Perspective Analysis of the Single African Air Transport Market (SAATM). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024: 1-116. [3]Secchi C, Gili A. Enhancing resilience in chaotic world: the role of infrastructure. 2023. [4]Raimundo R J, Baltazar M E, Cruz S P. Sustainability in the airports ecosystem: a literature review. Sustainability, 2023, 15(16): 12325. [5]Yarveisy, R., Gao, C., & Khan, F. A simple yet robust resilience assessment metrics. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2020, 197: 106810. [6]Guo J, Li Y, Yang Z, et al. Quantitative method for resilience assessment framework of airport network during COVID-19. Plos one, 2021, 16(12): e0260940. [7]Guo D, Shan M, Owusu E K. Resilience assessment frameworks of critical infrastructures: state-of-the-art review. Buildings, 2021, 11(10): 464. [8]Ojo B, Ogborigbo J C, Okafor M O. Innovative solutions for critical infrastructure resilience against cyber-physical attacks. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2024, 22(3): 1651-1674. [9]Long Q, Ma J, Jiang F, et al. Demand analysis in urban air mobility: A literature review. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2023, 112: 102436. [10]Xiao G, Wang Y, Wu R, et al. Sustainable maritime transport: A review of intelligent shipping technology and green port construction applications. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2024, 12(10): 1728. [11]Van Meerbeek K, Jucker T, Svenning J C. Unifying the concepts of stability and resilience in ecology. Journal of Ecology, 2021, 109(9): 3114-3132. [12]Wang, L., Jia, J., Zhai, Y., et al. Study on the Potential of Species Diversity in Predicting Urban Forest Canopy Structure Using Collaborative Air-Ground Data. Geographical Science, 1-11 [2024-10-13]. [13]Jiang, Y., Cheng, Y. Resilience Levels and Spatial Pattern Evolution of the "Ecological-Economic" System in China's Provincial Forestry. Journal of Agricultural and Forestry Economics and Management, 1-12 [2024-10-13]. [14]Cai, X., Wu, Y., Zou, X. Resilience Network Formation Mechanism of Alternative Agricultural Production from a Social-Ecological System Perspective: A Case Study of Guangzhou . Geographical Science, 2024, 44(09): 1524-1533. [15]Ma, C., Wen, C., Li, Y. Land-Sea Coordination Measurement and Governance of Bay Ecological Resilience: Based on a Systemic Perspective of Xiamen Bay . Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(12): 5102-5115. [16]Wandelt S, Zhang A, Sun X. Global Airport Resilience Index: Towards a comprehensive understanding of air transportation resilience. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2025, 138: 104522. [17]Feo-Valero M, Botella-Andreu A, Martínez-Moya J, et al. Exploring supply chain and regional resilience through the analysis of the transport dimension. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2024, 16: 101216. [18]LEBEDEVAL, SHKUROPADSKA D. Resilience of transport logistics in EU and Ukraine. Foreign trade: economics, finance, law, 2024, 135(4): 108-127. [19]Kumar C, Jha S K, Yadav D K, et al. A generalized approach to construct node probability table for Bayesian belief network using fuzzy logic. The Journal of Supercomputing, 2024, 80(1): 75-97.