STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
An Analysis of the Construction of Epidemic Discourse in “Together” from the Perspective of Transitivity
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jhet.202415335
Author(s)
Humei Ren, Xiongyong Cheng
Affiliation(s)
School of Foreign Languages, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Abstract
The Chinese and English lyrics of the anti-epidemic song Together are employed as the research corpus of the paper. The sentences of the two types of lyrics are analyzed from the perspective of systematic functional linguistics to explore people’s attitudes toward COVID-19 pandemic in the post-epidemic era and the language differences between Chinese and English. Findings show that: on the one hand, although people have mentalities of helplessness and evasion about the epidemic, they have shown a positive and optimistic attitude toward it on the whole; on the other hand, there are many differences between Chinese and English languages: (1) Chinese emphasizes parataxis while English emphasizes hypotaxis; (2) Chinese uses animate subject, English uses inanimate subject; (3) Chinese uses more dynamic sentence, English uses more static sentence; (4) Chinese uses more simple sentences, English uses more complex sentences; (5) Chinese uses more null subjects while English uses more formal subjects. It is found that transitivity system contributes to provide a unique research perspective to do research on epidemic-related discourse analysis.
Keywords
Transitivity; Discourse Analysis; Post-epidemic Era; Song; Language Differences
References
[1]Sun Shaoyong. (2022). Risk Evolution and Target Strategy of Online Public Opinion Governance in the Post-epidemic Era. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University(Social Sciences), (04): 28-35. [2]Zhao Enuo. (2022). Sing the song “Pilot” to encourage the power of youth. People’s Daily, 02-03(4). [3]Zhou Xiaomei. (2011). Music Promotes Beliefs--Music Power as Evidenced from Songs “The Sacred War” and “The Deep Sea”. Journal of Bohai University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition), 34(03): 105-107. [4]Feng Enhao, Hong Gang. (2022). A Research on the Image of China in Pandemic Related News Headlines: A Transitivity Analysis. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, (01): 48-55. [5]Zhu Hui. (2021). The National Image of China from the Perspective of Transitivity: A Case Study of News Headlines in China Daily during the Post-pandemic Era. Foreign Language Education, 21(01): 72-84. [6]Chua Zheqian, Shao Ying. (2020). A Transitivity Analysis of News Headlines about China in the Malaysian Mainstream Media Berita Harian during the COVID-19 Epidemic. Journal of Zhejiang International Studies University, (06): 30-36. [7]Ning Zhenjiang, He Xiaojing. (2020). A Transitivity Analysis of News Headlines on China in the Spanish Mainstream Media El País during the COVID-19 Epidemic. Journal of Zhejiang International Studies University, (06): 21-29. [8]Hu Xiaobin. (2021). A Contrastive Study of the Construction of China’s National Image under the COVID-19 Epidemic by the Chinese and American Media: A Corpus-assisted Threedimensional Discourse Analysis. Journal of Tianjin Foreign Studies University, 28(04): 74-86. [9]Chen Na. (2023). A Corpus-based Comparative Study on English News About Anti-epidemic Measures. Journal of Harbin University, 44(01): 109-113. [10]Huang Guowen, Zhang Peijia. (2020). The nature, characteristics and development of systemic functional linguistics. Modern Foreign Languages, 43(05): 601-611. [11]Zhang Delu. (2018). Research on the development trend of systematic functional linguistics in the past 60 years. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 50(01): 37-48+160. [12]Martin, J. R. & D. Rose. (2003). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. London & New York: Continuum. [13]Lemke, J. L. (2020). Introduction to MCA Symposium on Halliday and Vygotsky. Mind, Culture and Activity. 27: 210-215. [14]Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. [15]Hu Zhuanglin, Zhu Yongsheng, Zhang Delu, Li Zhanzi. (2005). Introduction to systemic functional linguistics. Beijing: Peking University Press. [16]Halliday, M. A. K. & C. M. I. M. (2014). Matthiessen. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar(4th edition). London: Routledge. [17]Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. New York: Longman Publishing. [18]Thompson, G. (2000). Introducing Functional Grammar. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. [19]Cao Jin, Yang Mingtuo. (2022). Analysis of the Ecological Discourse of Network News Based on Transitivity System. Journal of Northwest Normal University(Social Sciences), 59(02): 136-144. [20]He Kangning. (2018). A Functional Study from Perspective of Transitivity on “One Tree Hill”. Journal of Chengdu Normal University, 34(08): 119-124. [21]Wang Yin. (2010). On Blue and White Porcelain--A functional study from perspective of transitivity. Journal of Hebei Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences), 33(01): 101-104. [22]Shen Dan. (1998). Research on narratology and stylistics of fiction. Beijing: Peking University Press. [23]Lian Shuneng. (2010). Comparative study of English and Chinese. Higher Education Press.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved