STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
The Value Connotation, Development Path and Practical Strategy of Educational Evaluation Reform in the New Era
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jhet.202415517
Author(s)
Luo Pan1, Luo Ge2
Affiliation(s)
1School of Management, Guangzhou Huali University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China 2Huanghuai University, Zhumadian, Henan, China
Abstract
The establishment of a strong educational country by 2035 is an important strategic plan made at the Twentieth Party Congress. In addition to the future direction of teacher education evaluation in China becoming clearer, the reform measures and implementation paths suggested in the Overall Plan for Deepening the Reform of Educational Evaluation in the New Era are of great significance for optimizing the positioning of education types and building a strong country in education. This paper, using Guangzhou Huali University as an example, aims to develop a comprehensive evaluation system that encompasses schools, teachers, students, and employers. It also proposes solutions for the "five only" problems related to the key factors and encourages the adoption of educational evaluation reform in the modern era by providing a thorough analysis of subject differences, the development of scientific standards, and a clear evaluation development orientation.
Keywords
Educational Evaluation Reform; Development Path; Diversity Evaluation; Breaking the "Five Onlys"
References
[1] Wang Jian, Wang Zijun. Teacher Evaluation Reform in the New Era: From Breaking the "Five Onlys" to Establishing the "Four Haves"[J].China Education Journal,2021,(06):88-94. [2] Ren Zhanying. The path of constructing a new pattern of vocational education evaluation [J]. Research on Higher Engineering Education,2022,(01):11-16. [3] Feng Li, Li Yujing. Theoretical Innovation and Promotion Path of Building a Strong Country in Higher Education--A Review of the Forum on High Quality Development of Higher Education in the New Era[J]. Vocational and Technical Education,2023,44(27):7-10. [4] Zhou Guangli. Constructing a higher education evaluation system with Chinese characteristics[J]. Educational Research,2023,44(08):4-14. [5] Chen Wei. Countermeasures for the development of Guangdong higher education in the process of Chinese-style modernisation[J]. Exploration of Higher Education,2023,(01):5-7+22. [6] Wang Xiaomei, Wu Yingce, Huang Xiao, et al. Deepening the Reform of the Evaluation of College Teachers' Titles in the New Era: Achievements, Problems and Reflections[J].China Higher Education Research,2021,(06):72-77. [7] Wu Libo, Huang Kaiyin. Institutional reform of the construction of high-skilled talent team:goals, problems and paths[J].Education and Career,2023(03):38-44.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved