STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
Investigation on the Integration of Higher Education Logic Instruction and Cognitive Development
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jhet.202415523
Author(s)
Yuanyuan Li
Affiliation(s)
Guizhou Police College, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
Abstract
In the realm of higher education, the instruction of logic plays a crucial role in cultivating the intellectual prowess and analytical acumen of college students. However, the conventional teaching methods often lean towards a theoretical approach, which proves to be challenging in effectively achieving the desired outcomes. In light of this, this research endeavors to address this issue by proposing an outcome-based education (OBE) framework for logic instruction targeted at undergraduate students from non-philosophy disciplines and postgraduate students from non-logic fields. This innovative approach encompasses the utilization of case-based teaching methodologies, fostering subjective initiative, and transforming the assessment methods. The primary objective of this study is to bridge the gap between abstract logical knowledge and the practical application of logical thinking abilities among college students, enabling them to adapt seamlessly to the future demands of both academia and the professional world. Emphasizing the significance of logic instruction in higher education, this research places particular emphasis on nurturing students’ logical thinking capabilities that are relevant to their respective disciplines. By doing so, it aims to elevate their cognitive aptitude and enhance their overall capacity for learning.
Keywords
Logic Pedagogy; Cognitive Cultivation; Case-based Teaching Methodology; Subjective Initiative; Assessment Approach
References
[1] Zhang Jianjun. Several Perspectives on Achieving Comprehensive Modernization of “Logical Teaching”. Journal of Southwest University (Social Sciences Edition), 2012(4), 24-30. [2] Qian Xuesen. System Science, Cognitive Science, and Human Body Science. Natural Magazine, 1981(1), 5. [3] Qian Xuesen. On Cognitive Science. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 1986, 144. [4] Zhang Jianjun. Toward a Hierarchal “View of Logic in Broad Sense” ——Retrospection and Reflection of the Two Major Disputes on “View of Logic”. Academic Monthly, 2011(11), 38-47. [5] Wang Xisheng, Zhang Jianjun. The Social Function of Logic. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2010, 15. [6] Lyu Yixin, Geng Guohua. Problems, Objective and Methods: University Logic Course Teaching Reform. Journal of Ningbo Institute of Education, 2011(6), 10-13. [7] Liu Hongli. Conceptualization of the Ideal Teaching Model for Logic Courses in Police Colleges. Journal of Shandong Police College, 2014(5), 148-151. [8] Dai Ningshu. Hierarchical and Diversified University Logic Teaching. Journal of Tianzhong, 2012(2), 125-127. [9] Li Zhanglyu. The Reform of College Logic Education Based on Flipped Classroom. Journal of Guizhou University of Engineering Science, 2015(5), 45-49. [10] Zhang Xiaomang. The Logical Basis of Innovative Thinking. Nankai Journal(Philosophy, Literature and Social Science Edition), 2006(6), 88-96. [11] Zhang Xiaomang. Non-Logical Factors in Analogical Reasoning. Journal of Social Science of Jiamusi University, 2004(4), 104-106. [12] Ian Leslie. Universities in innovation: critical mass and critical diversity. Journal of National Academy of Education Administration, 2006(9), 60-66.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved