STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
Research on the Reform Model of General Education Course in Public Relations Etiquette Practice Based on COAF Concept
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jhet.202415547
Author(s)
Shanshan Hu1,2*
Affiliation(s)
1Business School, Lingnan Normal University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China 2Guangdong Coastal Economic Belt Development Research Center, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China *Corresponding Author.
Abstract
This study takes the general course of "Public Relations Etiquette Practice" at Lingnan Normal University as a case study, and deeply explores the curriculum reform model based on the COAF concept. By clarifying course objectives, optimizing teaching content, innovating teaching methods, and strengthening practical activities, this study has successfully improved the teaching quality of the course and promoted the comprehensive development of students. In the cycle of construction, operation, adjustment, and feedback, the curriculum is constantly optimized to meet the needs of the times and the characteristics of students. This study provides reform ideas for this course at Lingnan Normal University, and provides useful reference and inspiration for the reform of general education courses in other universities.
Keywords
Public Relations; Etiquette Practice; General Education Courses; Creative Spirit
References
[1]Geoffrey D Borman, Gina M Hewes, Laura T Overman, et al. Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 2003, 73(2), 125-230. [2]Young, V. M. (2006). Teacher’s use of data: Loose coupling, agenda setting, and team norms. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 521-548. [3]Cristine Smith, Marilyn Gillespie. Research on Professional Development and Teacher Change: Implications for Adult Basic Education. Review of Adult Learning and Literacy, 2007, 7, 40. [4]Amanda Datnow. The role of teachers in educational reform: A 20-year perspective. Journal of Educational Change, 2020, 21, 431-441. [5]Edith S Gummer, Ellen B Mandinach. Building a conceptual framework for data literacy. Teachers College Record, 2015, 117(4), 1-22. [6]Anne Hynds. Unpacking resistance to change within-school reform programmes with a social justice orientation. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 2010, 13(4), 377-392. [7]Shanshan Hu. Research on the Talent Training Model for E-commerce Majors in Lingnan Normal University under the Background of Digital Economy. Adult and Higher Education,2023,5(16),103-109. [8]Vicki Park, & Amanda Datnow. Ability grouping and differentiated instruction in an era of data-driven decision making. American Journal of Education, 2017, 123(2), 281-306. [9]Rebecca Saunders. The role of teacher emotions in change: Experiences, patterns and implications for professional development. Journal of Educational Change, 2013, 4(3), 303-333. [10]Priscilla Wohlstetter, Amanda Datnow, Vicki Park. Creating a system for data-driven decision-making: Applying the principal-agent framework. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2008, 19(3), 239-259. [11]Juyan Che, Weinan Liu, Jie Wang, et al. The construction of the competency model and its application in talent cultivation. International Journal of Wireless and Mobile Computing, 2023, 25(3),250-257.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved