Research on the Integration Path of KWL Model and Character and Civic Education in College English

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jhet.202515117

Author(s)

Yuxiao Luo

Affiliation(s)

Zhongshan Institute, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China

Abstract

This article investigates the integration path of the KWL model and character and civic education (CCE) within the context of College English instruction. It emphasizes that College English teachers should not solely concentrate on language proficiency but also on the cultivation of students’ moral character and social responsibility. The KWL model, which encompasses three cognitive stages—What I Know, What I Want to Know, and What I Learned—encourages active student participation in the English learning process while enhancing critical thinking and innovative abilities. This study posits that teachers should extract elements of CCE, intertwine them with socially relevant topics, and design engaging activities to enhance students’ character and civic literacy. Innovative methodologies such as case analysis, role-playing, and flipped classrooms are proposed to facilitate a deeper understanding of CCE contents. Furthermore, the design of practical activities and a diversified evaluation system are crucial to ensure the comprehensiveness and effectiveness of CCE in College English. Ultimately, the integration of the KWL model and CCE will significantly contribute to the cultivation of well-rounded foreign language talents.

Keywords

KWL Model; College English; Character and Civic Education; Integration Path

References

[1] Xu Yuanyuan. The Exploration of Reform Paths for College English under the Perspective of “Integration of Five Educations”. Journal of Jiamusi Vocational Institute, 2024, 40(11): 146-148. [2] Deng Wenjing. “Moral Education” and “Implied Moral Education” in College English Curriculum under Constructivism. Heilongjiang Education (Research and Evaluation of Higher Education), 2024, (06): 76-79. [3] Liu Haiyan. Research on Innovative Teaching Methods in College English. University, 2020, (52): 33-34. [4] Wang Lina. Exploration of Reform and Innovation in Teaching Methods and Models of College English — A Review of “Research on College English Teaching” Research in Educational Development, 2019, 39(24): 85. [5] Szabo S. The K-W-L Strategy: Helping Struggling Readers Build Evidence of Their Learning. Thinking classroom, 2007,8(2): 32-37. [6] Ogle, D. K-W-L: A Teaching Model That Develops Active Reading of Expository Text. The Reading Teacher,1986, (39): 564- 570. [7] Carr E, Ogle D. KWL Plus: A Strategy for Comprehension and Summarization. Journal of Reading,1987: 626-631. [8] Meng Zhaosu. Research on Educating College Students about Social Responsibility. Journal of Chuzhou University, 2024, 26(01): 98-102. [9] Wrinkle C S, Manivannan M K. Application of the K-W-L Teaching and Learning Method to an Introductory Physics Course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 2009,39(2): 47-51. [10] Raines D A. Using a KWL Chart to Bridge the Theory-Practice Gap. Nursing Education Perspectives, 2018,39(3): 182-183. [11] Dong Yan, Nie Yujing, Cai Xiangying. Research on the Development of KWL Teaching Model Related to Known and Unknown Knowledge. e-Education Research, 2020, 41(8): 33-42. [12] Zhang Leigang. Cultivation of Students’ Creative Thinking in College English Teaching. Journal of Yangling Vocational & Teaching College, 2022, 21 (04): 94-96. [13] He Qibin. An Overview of College English Teaching. Beijing: Guangming Daily Publishing House, 2021. [14] Liu Guohui. Research on the Reform of College English Teaching in China from an International Perspective. Journal of Southwest Minzu University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 30 (05): 261-265. [15] Li Ping. Development of the International Horizon of the Undergraduates in English Teaching. Journal of Hebei Normal University (Educational Science), 2011, 13 (04): 100-104.