Ecological Transformation of After-School Service Development in Primary and Secondary Schools in China

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jhet.202515128

Author(s)

Bingchao Huang

Affiliation(s)

School of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Abstract

With the adjustment of the birth system, after-school services in Chinese primary and secondary schools have become a common family demand. The development process of after-school services in primary and secondary schools is divided into three stages of germination and disorder, market leading period and burden reduction and quality improvement period, which are divided into three types: basic trusteeship, extension service and compensation service. For a long time, off-campus training institutions have been the main position of after-school service. The "DR System" requires primary and secondary schools to undertake after-school service tasks. The concept of after-school service education has begun to change, the supply relationship has been improved, the ecological environment has been continuously optimized, and the coordination mechanism has gradually formed, which has met the diversified needs of students and greatly improved the after-school service ecology.

Keywords

After-School Service; Ecological Transformation; Dr System; Off-Campus Training; Primary and Secondary School

References

[1] Zou Min. Discussion on the attributes and rights and responsibilities of after-school services for primary and secondary school students. China Educational Journal, 2020 (3): 32-36. [2] Kang Liying. Promoting children's growth: Discussion on multi-subject after-school service collaborative education. China Educational Journal, 2020 (3): 22-26. [3] Wu Kaijun, Jiang Suzhen, Yu Zilin. Policy design and Practice review of after-school services for primary and secondary school students: Based on analysis of policy texts in ten eastern provinces and cities. China Educational Journal, 2020 (3): 27-31. [4] Barton J. Hirsch. Learning and Development in After-School Programs. Kappan, 2011, (5): 66-69. [5] Joseph L. Mahoney, Edward F. Ziger. Translating science to police under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001: Lessons from the national evaluation of the 21st-Century Community Learning Centers. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,2006, (27):282-294. [6] He Pengcheng, Song Yichen. Discussion on the theory of educational public service. Educational Development Research, 2008 (9) :39-43. [7] Yang Qing-Xi, Wu Zhi-hui. The blocking points of after-school services in compulsory education schools and their solutions. Educational Development Research, 2021 (15): 42-49. [8] Zhang Bing, Cheng Tianjun. Expedient execution: The practical logic of after-school services. Educational Development Research, 2021(15-16):50-58. [9] Zhou Xueguang. The Institutional logic of China's State governance. Beijing: Life, Reading, Xinzhi Sanlian Bookstore, 2017:29. [10] Wu Kaijun, Yu Zilin, Huang Bingchao. Ecological changes and multiple synergies of after-school services under the "DR System". China Educational Journal, 2023 (3): 12-17.