STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
Power Dynamics in Language Classrooms: A Bibliometric Review and Its Implications for Education
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jhet.202515223
Author(s)
Chai Ting1,2
Affiliation(s)
1School of English and International Studies, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China 2Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, Shandong, China
Abstract
The relationship of language and power has been studied from various perspectives. Since different forms of power exist in the classroom, especially in the language classroom setting, educators or stake holders are facing even more challenges. To make a relatively systematic description and analysis on this subject, this study adopts a quantitative approach to conduct the review using CiteSpace software 5.8 R3, with the support of which we can visualize the information collected from Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) and Arts and Humanity Citation Index (AHCI). The findings indicate that the high-yield countries studied in this field include the United States, England and Canada which are also countries of significant number of immigrants. Besides, and hot research topics include applying critical discourse analysis and critical literacy in the language classroom, enhancing the research of power in language education, and constructing learners’ identity in language classroom.
Keywords
Power Dynamics; Language Classroom Setting; Identity; Citespace
References
[1] Babaii, E., Parsazadeh, A., & Moradi, H. (2017). The question of power in language classes from a critical discourse analysis perspective. Pragmatics and Society, 8(4), 542–570. [2] Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press. [3] Caglitutuncigil, T. (2018). Between myth and reality: language classrooms in Spanish and Catalan social integration programmes. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(5), 431–444. [4] Canagarajah, S. (1999). Resisting Linguistic Imperialism in English Teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [5] Cummins,Jim.(2000). Language, Power, and Pedagogy: Bilingual children in the Crossfire. Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters Ltd. [6] Egitim, S. (2021). Collaborative leadership in English language classrooms: engaging learners in leaderful classroom practices and strategies. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–21. [7] Ellis, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [8] Gao, F. (2009). Language and power: Korean–Chinese students’ language attitude and practice. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 30(6), 525–534. [9] García-Mateus, S. (2020). Bilingual student perspectives about language expertise in a gentrifying two-way immersion program. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, (7), 1–16. [10] Gomez Lobaton, J. C. (2012). Language learners’ identities in EFL settings: resistance and power through discourse. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 14(1), 60-85. [11] Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London / New York: Longman. [12] Foucault, M. (1976). The Archeology of knowledge and the Discourse on Language. Trans, A.M Sheridan Smith [M]. New York: HarPer & Row. [13] Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and Other Writings, 1972/1977. Trans. C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham, and K. Soper. Brighton: Harvester Press. [14] Foucault, M. (1991). Remarks on Marx. New York: Semiotext(e). [15] Hruska, B. (2004). ‘Constructing gender in an English dominant kindergarten: Implications for second language learners’. TESOL Quarterly, 38(3), 459-485. [16] Jang, E.-Y. (2016). “We Got Rid of Her Sentence for Revenge”: Re-Viewing Second-Language Learner Strategies Considering Multiple Tensions in the ESL Classroom. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 24(1), 32–46. [17] Li, Jie & Chen, Chaomei. (2017). CiteSpace: Text Mining and Visualization in Scientific Literature. Beijing: Capital University of Economics and Business Press. [18] Luke, C., S. de Castell, & A. Luke. (1998). Beyond criticism: The authority of the school textbook. In Luke A., and Luke C. (eds.). Language Authority and Criticism: Readings on the School Textbook. London: Falmer, 245–260. [19] Müjdeci, Ş. (2017). Turkish EFL Teachers' Perspectives on Classroom Management. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 7(2), 177-189. [20] Norton, B. (1995). Social Identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29 (1), 9-30. [21] Norton, B. (2000). Identity and Language Learning: Gender, Ethnicity and Educational Change. Essex, UK: Longman. [22] Norton, B. and Stem K. (2004). Critical pedagogies and language learning: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [23] Opoku-Amankwa, K. (2009). “Teacher only calls her pets”: teacher’s selective attention and the invisible life of a diverse classroom in Ghana. Language and Education, 23(3), 249–262. [24] Palmer, D. K. (2008). Building and destroying students’ “academic identities”: the power of discourse in a two‐way immersion classroom. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 21(6), 647–667. [25] Pavlenko, A., et al. (2001). Multilingualism, Second Language Learning, and Gender. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter [26] Peña, H. A. (2010). ‘The next teacher is going to be… Tereza Rico’: Exploring gender positioning in an all-girl preschool classroom. Magis, Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 3 (5), 107-124. [27] Peña, H. A. (2011). “I said it!” “I’m first!”: Gender and language-learner identities. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 10(10), 112-134. [28] Pennycook, A. (1989). The concept of method, interested knowledge, and the politics of language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4), 591–615. [29] Pennycook, A. (1994). The Cultural Politics of English as an International language. London, UK: Longman. [30] Pennycook, A. (1999). Introduction: Critical approaches to TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 329–348. [31] Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical Applied Linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [32] Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [33] Read, B. (2008). “The world must stop when I’m talking”: gender and power relations in primary teachers’ classroom talk. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(6), 609–621. [34] Tainio, L. (2011). Gendered address terms in reproach sequences in classroom interaction. Linguistics and Education, 22(4), 330–347. [35] Tajfel, H. (1974) Social identity and intergroup behavior. Social Science Information, (13), 65–93. [36] Talamantes, M. D. R. (2021). A Critical Classroom Study of Language Oppression: Manuel and Malena’s Testimonios, “Sentía como que yo no valía nada . . . se reían de mí.” Journal of Latinos and Education, 18(2), 1–22. [37] Tian, W., & Dumlao, R. (2020). Impacts of Positioning, Power, and Resistance on EFL Learners’ Identity Construction through Classroom Interaction: A Perspective from Critical Classroom Discourse Analysis. The Qualitative Report, 25(6), 1-23. [38] Van Dijk, T. 2001. Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis [ A]. In M. Wethell, S. Taylor & S. J. Taylor (eds.), 2001. Discourse Theory and Practice [C]. London: Sage Publications. [39] Valentina, C., & Elena, I. (2019). Classroom communities, language choices and accessibility to discourse: the case of a multi-ethnic/multilingual class of a private school in Cyprus. International Multilingual Research Journal, 14(1), 58–75. [40] Van Lier, T. (1988). The Classroom and the Language Learner: Ethnography and Second Language Classroom Research. New York, NY: Longman. [41] Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in Action. Oxon: Routledge. [42] Yasemin O. (2013). “The Right Things Are What I Expect Them to Do”: Negotiation of Power Relations in an English Classroom. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 12(2), 96-115.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved