STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
Research on the Teaching Reflection Model for Finance and Accounting Teachers Based on Learning Analytics
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jhet.202515226
Author(s)
Jun Wang
Affiliation(s)
Fuzhou University of International Studies and Trade, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
Abstract
This study concentrates on the practical requirements of teaching reform for the accounting major in the context of educational digital transformation. It addresses the static and homogeneous issues of traditional experiential teaching reflections by exploring an innovative approach to a learning analysis technology-driven teaching reflection model. Through the integration of classroom behavior data, learning process data, academic performance data, and industry dynamic data using learning analysis techniques, a dual-cycle reflection model of “data iterative optimization— cognitive level transition” is established. Furthermore, a comprehensive implementation framework that encompasses data collection, visual diagnosis, and teaching decision transformation is proposed. Additionally, to ensure the effective implementation of data-driven teaching reflection, implementation strategies must be constructed from three perspectives: coordination mechanism, technical toolchain, and guarantee mechanism, considering the professionalism of accounting disciplines and the practicality of teachers' operations. This study broadens the theoretical boundary between learning analysis and teaching reflection and assists accounting education in meeting the needs of the industry's intelligent transformation at a practical level, offering a methodological reference for the cultivation of versatile accounting professionals.
Keywords
Learning Analytics; Teaching Reflection; Data Drive; Critical Reflection
References
[1] Pandeng Lin, Liguo Zhang, Fuyu Zhou. From experience review to data-driven: artificial intelligence empowers teachers to reflect on new forms of teaching. Contemporary Educational Science, 2021, (10):3-10. [2] Dewey. How we think· Experience and Education. Wenmin Jiang, translated. Beijing: People's Education Press, 2005. [3] Yanling Wang, Shunming Gou. Teachers becoming “reflective practitioners”: Controversies and implications of teacher education in North America. Foreign primary and secondary education, 2011, (4):53-57+65. [4] Lan Ye. Teacher Role and Teacher Development. Beijing: Educational Science Press, 2001. [5] Changji LI, Xiaojun Zhang. The triple realm of teacher reflection. Curriculum. Textbooks. Truism, 2023, 43(10): 139-147. [6] Zishu Liu. Limitations and improvement of teachers' thinking quality in teaching reflection. Teaching and management, 2025, (02):1-5. [7] Yinghua Chang. The significance, connotation and practice path of teachers' teaching reflection. Education theory and practice, 2023, 43(28):41-45. [8] Yunjian Zhao, Minxue Xu, Zhao Zuo. The realistic picture, problem analysis and optimization direction of teachers' reflection on technology application-empirical analysis based on teaching reflection text. Electrified Education in China, 2023, (07):118-125. [9] Linmeng Lu, Xiaoqing Gu, Huiying Cai. Research on the difference of cognitive network between novice teachers and expert teachers in teaching reflection ability in man-machine collaborative scene. Modern distance education, 2024, (03):87-96. [10] Jie Yang, Ailing Qiao. Visual analysis of research in the field of learning analysis in China since 2011. China Educational Technology Equipment, 2025, (02):1-6+11. [11] Jin Zhou, Junmin Ye. Re-understanding and development path of learning analysis in the intelligent era. Digital Education, 2021, 7(3):9-14.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved