STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
The Transformation of Modern University Governance Models in the Context of Globalization in Higher Education
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jhet.202515333
Author(s)
Xuejia Tu
Affiliation(s)
School of Marxism, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan, China
Abstract
Driven by globalization and digitalization, the governance models of higher education are undergoing profound changes. This study explores the impact mechanisms of globalization on higher education governance, analyzes the challenges of balancing public and market logics, the blurring of responsibilities among multiple stakeholders, and the lag of institutional adaptation to technological change. It proposes strategies for future governance, including building adaptive governance mechanisms, optimizing multi-stakeholder collaborative frameworks, and promoting institutional innovations that balance technological empowerment with value preservation. These strategies aim to address the challenges posed by globalization and drive innovation in higher education governance models.
Keywords
Higher Education; Globalization; Modern Universities; Governance Models
References
[1] OECD. The State of Higher Education 2021. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2021. [2] World Bank. World Development Report 2022: Learning for All. Washington: World Bank, 2022. [3] IAU. 2022 Global Survey on Higher Education and SDGs. Paris: International Association of Universities, 2022. [4] Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. 2022 National Statistics Bulletin on Education Development. Beijing: Ministry of Education, 2023. [5] Chen Xiaoyu. Challenges and Pathways for the Modernization of Chinese University Governance. Educational Research, 2022, 43(5): 78-89. [6] UNESCO. Global Declaration on Higher Education for 2030. Paris: UNESCO, 2023. [7] McKinsey & Company. Reimagining University Operations. New York: McKinsey, 2022. [8] Clark, B. R. The Higher Education System. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983. [9] Geiger, R. L. The History of American Higher Education. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014. [10] Naidoo, R. The Competition Fetish in Higher Education. European Journal of Education, 2020, 55(4): 1-12. [11] Hazelkorn, E. Rankings and Governance. Higher Education Policy, 2021, 34(3): 1-20. [12] Shin, J. C., & Harman, G. New Challenges for Higher Education Governance. Journal of Educational Administration, 2021, 59(3): 221-235. [13] Knox, J. Artificial Intelligence and Education. Learning, Media and Technology, 2021, 46(3): 1-14. [14] Marginson, Simon.Public/ private in higher education: a synthesis of economic and political approaches. Studies in Higher Education, 2018:1-16. [15] Zhang Qingling. The Power Game: An Analysis of "Government-University Relationship" Models in University Governance—With Discussion on Optimizing Power Structures in China's Context. Modern Education Management, 2022(5).
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved