Investigating the Integration of the OBE Concept into Teaching Quality Evaluation in Higher Education: A Teacher Perspective
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jhet.202615130
Author(s)
Li Wang1,2, Hui Shi1,2, Bujinlkham Ts2,*
Affiliation(s)
1Guangzhou Huashang College, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
2Graduate University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
*Corresponding Author
Abstract
Outcome-Based Education (OBE) has become a key orientation for enhancing teaching quality and accountability in higher education. However, significant differences remain among universities in the extent to which the OBE concept is integrated into teaching quality evaluation systems and in how it relates to factors such as goal attainment, instructional design, assessment feedback, and resource support. From the teachers’ perspective, this study explores practical pathways for integrating OBE into teaching quality evaluation, using Guangzhou Huashang College as a case. Based on 300 valid questionnaire responses, the study develops a seven-dimensional framework covering teachers’ understanding of OBE (H), perceptions of the teaching quality evaluation system (J), the setting and attainment of teaching objectives (K), instructional design and teaching process (L), evaluation and feedback on teaching outcomes (M), teaching resources and support (N), and overall teaching quality evaluation (P). Drawing on the empirical evidence, the paper proposes targeted improvement strategies: strengthening teachers’ capacity building and professional learning communities, improving constructive alignment among outcomes, teaching, and assessment, establishing institutionalized feedback mechanisms for continuous improvement, and optimizing resource allocation to support outcome-oriented instructional design.
Keywords
Outcome-Based Education (OBE); Teaching Quality Evaluation; Teacher Perspective; Goal Attainment; Instructional Design; Assessment and Feedback; Resource Support
References
[1] Almuhaideb, A. M, & Saeed, S. (2020). Fostering sustainable quality assurance practices in outcome-based education: Lessons learned from ABET accreditation process of computing programs. Sustainability, 12(20), 8380. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208380.
[2] Alonzo, D, Bejano, J., & Labad, V. (2023). Alignment between teachers’ assessment practices and principles of outcomes-based education in the context of Philippine education reform. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 489–506. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16127a.
[3] Tsunami, C. K, Henríquez-Trujillo, A. R., Ferreira-Meyers, K., et al. (2024). Guidelines for integrating actionable A-SMART learning outcomes into the backward design process. MedEdPublish, 14, 242.
[4] Derouich, M. (2025). Ensuring outcome-based curriculum coherence through systematic CLO–PLO alignment and feedback loops. Discover Education, 4, Article 486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00915-7.
[5] Staring, F, Brown, M., Bacsich, P., & Ifenthaler, D. (2022). Digital higher education: Emerging quality standards, practices and supports (OECD Education Working Papers No. 281). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f622f257-en.
[6] Mahrishi, M., Ramakrishna, S., Hosseini, S., & Abbas, A. (2025). A systematic literature review of the global trends of outcome-based education (OBE) in higher education with an SDG perspective related to engineering education. Discover Sustainability, 6, 620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01496-z.
[7] Mufanti, R., Carter, D., & England, N. (2024). Outcomes-based education in Indonesian higher education: Reporting on the understanding, challenges, and support available to teachers. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100873.
[8] Baartman, L. K. J, & Quinlan, K. M. (2023). Assessment and feedback in higher education reimagined: Using programmatic assessment to transform higher education. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 28(2), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.
[9] Anderson, S. K., McLaren, E., & Mio, C. (2025). Mapping curriculum in higher education: Unveiling alignment, complexity, and ideology. Open Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 181–207.
[10] Alyasin, A., Nasser, R., El Hajj, M., & Harb, H. (2023). Assessing Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: From Practice to Systematization. TEM Journal, 12(3).