Comparison Between Perception of EFL Oral English Proficiency from Native Speakers and Non-Native Speakers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jhet.202615341
Author(s)
Yueqing Gu*
Affiliation(s)
School of Foreign Languages and Cultures, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
*Corresponding Author.
Abstract
This article conducts theoretical and applied analysis on the differences in perception of oral language ability between native English speakers and non-native English speakers among EFL learners. It proposes that there are two paths for the perception of oral language ability: one is the language processing path based on elements such as pronunciation, vocabulary, grammar, and fluency; the other is the social cognitive path combining accent, identity cognition, and stereotypes. Existing research has confirmed that listeners do not simply equate accent with language proficiency, but the two types of listeners have different emphasis in their evaluations: native speakers are more sensitive to phonological norms and fluency deviations; non-native speakers rely on common experiences in the second language and place more emphasis on communicative effectiveness and familiarity with the accent. The article, referring to the CEFR framework and domestic English proficiency scales, suggests that oral evaluation should abandon the single native language standard and establish a multi-dimensional evaluation system that takes into account dimensions such as comprehensibility and interactivity; at the teaching level, increase the input of diverse accents, optimize pronunciation training and interactive tasks, and improve the training of evaluators, in order to enhance the fairness of oral evaluation.
Keywords
EFL Oral Proficiency; Native Speakers and Non-Native Speakers; Accent Perception; Oral Evaluation; Multilingual Ability
References
[1] SAITO, K., & SHINTANI, N. (2016). Do Native Speakers of North American and Singapore English Differentially Perceive Comprehensibility in Second Language Speech? TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 421–446. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43893826
[2] Ballard, L., & Winke, P. (2017). Students’ Attitudes Towards English Teachers’ Accents: The Interplay of Accent Familiarity, Comprehensibility, Intelligibility, Perceived Native Speaker Status, and Acceptability as a Teacher. In T. Isaacs & P. Trofimovich (Eds.), Second Language Pronunciation Assessment: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (Vol. 107, pp. 121–140). Multilingual Matters & Channel View Publications. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.21832/j.ctt1xp3wcc.11.
[3] Council of Europe. (2020). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume. https://rm.coe.int/common-european-framework-of-reference-for-languages-learning-teaching/16809ea0d4Council of Europe
[4] Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in cognitive sciences, 11(2), 77-83.
[5] Hendriks, B., van Meurs, F., & Usmany, N. (2023). The effects of lecturers’ non-native accent strength in English on intelligibility and attitudinal evaluations by native and non-native English students. Language Teaching Research, 27(6), 1378-1407.
[6] Verbeke, G., Mitterer, H., & Simon, E. (2025). Phonetic reduction in native and non-native English speech: Assessing the intelligibility for L2 listeners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 28(2), 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728924000872
[7] Hendriks, B., van Meurs, F., & Usmany, N. (2026). The effects of lecturers’ non-native accent strength in English on intelligibility and attitudinal evaluations by native and non-native English students. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 47(3), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2025.2489651
[8] Han, B., & Wang, L. (2024). Integrating CSE and CEFR into Chinese EFL curriculum design and NNEST professional development. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(8), 679–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2297643
[9] Mendonça, L., & Thomas, M. (2025). Ditching accent elimination: Multiaccent input, task-mediated meaning negotiation and NNEST professional development in Chinese tertiary EFL. Journal of English for International Communication, 23(2), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794408.2024.2447892