Centennial Changes in Guideline of Standardized Development in Non-state HEIs in China: From the Perspective of Educational Psychology

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jhve.202416407

Author(s)

Xue Nan, Chunhang Shi, Yinkui Li*

Affiliation(s)

Qinghai Minzu University, Xining, Qinghai, China *Corresponding Author.

Abstract

With the continuous development of the society, the evolution of China's Non-state Higher Education Institutions guideline is facing new challenges. Based on the perspective of educational psychology, this study examines the Changes in guideline process of Non-state HEIs in China and raises the existing problems. The non-state HEIs system of China has experienced its changes in historical stages from inheritance, vanish to rebirth and development since late Qing Dynasty due to its education system and guideline have been playing the most important role in the development. The modern higher education system of China was established in the late Qing Dynasty during which modern non-state HEIs started at almost the same time. Confronting the disordered development in running schools, the provisional authority in the republic period used a variety of guideline instruments to effectively solve the problem that colleges were randomly upgraded to the universities. After the founding of new China, the non-state HEIs of China have experienced three periods of development: reform, termination, revival and development based on the states regulations and rules. HEIs have become standardized. The troublesome issues of orientation, profit, financing in running schools have been finally solved after the introduction and revision of the Non-state Education Promotion Law of PR China.

Keywords

Non-state HEIs; Standardization of Running Schools; Reform of Educational Institutions; Educational Guidelines and Regulations

References

[1] Yang, C. (2023). Development trends, practical dilemmas and promotion strategies of classified management of private universities. China Higher Education Research, (05), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.16298/j.cnki.1004-3667. 2023.05.09. [2] Chen, F., & Liu, H. (2023). Strategies to improve the educational governance capabilities of private universities. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 45(S1), 73-75. [3] Lin, X. (2022). The impact of organizational support on the development motivation of university teachers: The mediating role of basic psychological needs. Chinese Journal of Health Psychology, 30(11), 1654-1660. [4] Chu, X., & Tang, L. (1991). Compilation of materials on the history of modern education in China: The evolution of the academic system. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press. [5] Jin, Z., Li, R., & Wang, G. (2003). History of Private Education in China. Beijing: China Social Sciences Publishing. [6] Song, E., & Zhang, X. (1990). Selected Education Laws and Regulations of the Republic of China. Nanjing: Jiangsu Education Press. [7] Gu, M. (1997). Historical review and prospect analysis of China’s private higher education. Educational Research, 8, 45-49. [8] Wang, B. (1997). Research on ancient Chinese private schools and modern private schools. Jinan: Shandong Education Press. [9] Fu, K. (1954). What I saw in Soviet higher education institutions. Times Publishing House. [10] Mao, L., & Shen, G. (1989). General History of Chinese Education (Vol. 6). Shandong Education Press. [11] Wu, T. (1995). My opinion on the issue of running schools with social forces. Internal manuscript, (24), 15-19. [12] Tao, H. (1995). Unified title is the need for the development of social forces in running schools. Chengcai, (6), 46. [13] Wu, R. (1993). Thoughts on the definition of school-running entities. Education Review, (6), 8-10. [14] Lu, C. (2008). On the synchronicity of private higher education and private economic development. Educational Development Research, 2008(8), 1-5. [15] Liang, K. (2008). Research on the education model and survival and development issues of China’s private universities. Education and Occupation, (9), 34-36.