Safety Supervision Practices and Data Analysis of Nitration Enterprises in Jiangsu Province

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jiem.202403401

Author(s)

Zhilei Fan1, Fajie Qiao2,*

Affiliation(s)

1Nanjing NJTech Emergency Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing, Jiangsu, China 2China Chemical Safety Association, Beijing, China *Corresponding Author.

Abstract

With the rapid development of domestic chemical technology, the safety problems of nitrification enterprises have become more and more prominent, posing a serious threat to public safety, and the community was once “afraid of nitrate”. This paper takes the nitrification enterprises in Jiangsu Province, China as an example, and analyzes the data of the government's implementation of optimizing risk assessment, enhancing intrinsic safety, improving competence and quality, and perfecting emergency response and other safety regulatory measures, and the results show that the risk indicators of nitrification enterprises in 2023 have been significantly reduced compared to 2020, and the average risk value has decreased by 33%, and the overall risks of nitrification enterprises in Jiangsu Province have been effectively controlled. The four safety supervision measures are precise in direction, clear in standard, and remarkable in effect. After the implementation, there has not been a single fatal accident in the nitrification enterprises in Jiangsu Province so far, which can be a reference for the national nitrification enterprises as well as other high-risk sub-fields of safety remediation.

Keywords

Jiangsu Province; Nitration Enterprises; Safety Supervision; Data Analysis

References

[1] Sun Yanning. The illegal storage of waste materials, fraudulent mixing of the pass, an explosion caused a catastrophe and innocent people - Jiangsu Ringshui Tianjiaoyi Chemical Co. Jilin Labor Protection, 2019(11). [2] Misra S, Roberts P, Rhodes M. The ecology of emergency management work in the digital age. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 2020, 3(4): 305-322 [3] Apostolidou A. Digitally situated knowledge: Connectivism, anthropology and epistemological pluralism. International Journal of Educational Research, 2022, 115(1):102047. [4] Janowski T.2015.Digital government evolution: from transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3)221-236 [5] Scupola A, Zanfei A.2016.Governance and innovation in public sector services: the case of the digital library. Government Information Quarterly, 33(2): 23-249. [6] Paulin A. 2017. Informating public governance: towards a basis for a digital ecosystem. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age, 4(2):14-32. [7] Wang C, Medaglia R, Zheng L.2018.Towards a typology of adaptive governance in the digital government context: the role of decision-making and accountability. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2). [8] Alhinai Y S. Disaster management digitally transformed: Exploring the impact and key determinants from the UK national disaster management experience. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 2020(51):1 -29 [9] Iglesias C A, Favenza A, Carrera Á. A bigdata reference architecture for emergency management. Information, 2020, 11(12):569. [10] Xu Renhao. Discussion and practice of process safety management risk control in petrochemical enterprises. Petrochemical safety and environmental protection technology, 2017, 33(02):29-32+14. [11] Liu Yongqiang, Huang Jian. Application and development trend of “five-in-one” informationization management in chemical enterprises. China Petroleum and Chemical Standards and Quality, 2022, 42(12): 76-78. [12] Zhang Xiaomin. Ministry of Emergency Management: Elimination of 7 outdated hazardous chemicals process technology and equipment. China Petroleum and Chemical Industry, 2024, (04):53.