Research on Risk Evaluation of Low-Carbon Supply Chain in Construction Industry Based on Game Theory Combined Weighting-Cloud Model

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jiem.202503206

Author(s)

Tiankai Zhen

Affiliation(s)

School of Management, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, China

Abstract

The global issue of extreme climate is severe, and the construction industry poses a serious challenge to the environment due to its high energy consumption and high emissions. Against this backdrop, the low-carbon transformation of the construction industry is extremely urgent, and the low-carbon supply chain in the construction industry has become a research hotspot. Based on literature research, 28 key risk factors in different stages of the low-carbon supply chain in the construction industry are identified, and a risk evaluation index system is established accordingly. A risk evaluation model for the low-carbon supply chain in the construction industry is established through the method of game theory combination weighting - cloud model. Taking G Construction Company as the case background, a comprehensive analysis of the overall low-carbon level and risks of its low-carbon supply chain is conducted, and a series of corresponding risk control countermeasures are proposed to verify the effectiveness and scientificity of the evaluation model, which has certain theoretical and practical significance for the low-carbon transformation of the construction industry.

Keywords

Low-Carbon Supply Chain; Game Theory; Cloud Model; Risk Assessment; Risk Management

References

[1]Peng, Junlong, et al. "Promoting Low-Carbonization in the Construction Supply Chain: Key Influencing Factors and Sustainable Practices." Sustainability 17.8 (2025): 3375. [2]Ahmadi S, Fakehi H A, Vakili A, et al. An optimization model for the long-term energy planning based on useful energy, economic and environmental pollution reduction in residential sector: A case of Iran. Journal of Building Engineering, 2020, 30(C):101247-101247. [3]Louise D ,David O ,Leela K , et al.Investigating Residential Building Materials in a Circular Economy: An Australian Perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,2024,150(9). [4]Yang Y, Yu Y, Yu C, et al. Data-driven logistics collaboration for prefabricated supply chain with multiple factories. Automation in Construction,2024,168(PA):105802-105802. [5]Greer, Fiona, et al. "Energy and water efficiency in LEED: How well are LEED points linked to climate outcomes?." Energy and buildings 195 (2019): 161-167. [6]Wang, Yanyan, Lijun Qi, and Weng Cui. "Analysis of Multi-Stakeholder Behavioral Strategies in the Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Industry through an Evolutionary Game Theory." Buildings 14.5 (2024): 1425. [7]Chang C J ,Graves C S, Kirchain E R , et al.Integrated Planning for Design and Production in Two-Stage Recycling Operations. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 273(2): 535-547. [8]Yang, Wei, Han Li, and feng Shi. "Collaborative innovation in low-carbon supply chain under cap-and-trade: Dual perspective of contracts and regulations." Journal of Cleaner Production 499 (2025): 145223. [9]Kaiying C, Qiang G, Yuqiu X .Information sharing and carbon reduction strategies with extreme weather in the platform economy. International Journal of Production Economics, 2023,255. [10]Rezaei J .Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 2015, 5349-57. [11]Qi Y ,Xue K ,Wang W , et al.Coal and gas protrusion risk evaluation based on cloud model and improved combination of assignment. Scientific reports, 2024, 14(1): 4551-4551. [12]Wang D, Zeng D B, Singh V P, et al. A multidimension cloud model-based approach for water quality assessment. Environmental Research, 2016, 149: 113-121.