Literature Review on Developmental Teacher Evaluation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jike.202304404

Author(s)

Mu Ping, Yao Di*

Affiliation(s)

College of Applied Science and Technology, Beijing Union University, Beijing, China *Corresponding author

Abstract

Developmental teacher evaluation is a new type of future-oriented teacher evaluation system. The evaluation of each teacher should be a complete and comprehensive evaluation of the teacher's current level of development and characteristics, his or her emotional attitude towards work, current working conditions and future development. This paper reviews the relevant research findings on developmental teacher evaluation. Firstly, the development history of teacher evaluation at home and abroad, relevant domestic research and research gaps are discussed in depth. The main conclusions are as follows: firstly, the research on teacher evaluation modes is too concentrated, mainly focusing on two modes of reward and punishment evaluation and developmental evaluation, while the research on other evaluation modes is relatively less; secondly, the research on the content of teacher evaluation is uneven, focusing more on the quality of classroom teaching and scientific research evaluation, while the research on the complete teacher evaluation system is relatively less; lastly, the number of researches on the problems of the teacher evaluation system and countermeasures is higher, but the number of researches on the construction of teacher evaluation system is higher. Finally, the number of studies on the problems and countermeasures of teacher evaluation system is high, but the research on building a systematic and complete teacher evaluation system is insufficient.

Keywords

Developmental Teacher Evaluation; Literature research; Reward And Punishment Evaluation

References

[1] Ren Danying. Analysis of Research Hotspots of Teacher Evaluation in China Based on Knowledge Mapping [J]. Research on Education Science ,2019(5):84-91. [2] Qin Shenglong, Li Min. The construction of teacher work evaluation mechanism in higher vocational colleges and universities [J]. China vocational and technical education ,2018(4):85-88. [3] Chen Shuwei. Strategies for the construction of evaluation system of teachers' professional development in higher vocational colleges and universities [J]. China Vocational and Technical Education ,2017(35):91-95. [4] Jiang Fei, Feng Tingting. Reflections on the evaluation system of university teachers under the guidance of "double first-class" construction [J]. Thinking about the evaluation system of university teachers under the guidance of "double first-class" construction [J]. Shanghai Education Research and Evaluation ,2019(4):35-38,60. [5] Hao Shiwen, Rao Congman. Teacher Evaluation Reform in the United States: The Student Learning Objectives method and warnings [J]. Research on Foreign Education ,2019(10):3-14. [6] Li Chao. Practical Experience and Implications of Teacher Evaluation Reform in U.S. Elementary and Middle Schools [J]. Education Guide ,2019(5):90-96. [7] Liu Zhifei. Research on teacher evaluation and its standards in Japan: content, problems, and inspiration [J]. Culture and Art ,2019(10):248-249. [8] Yang Jianyun, Wang Zhuo. On the substance of developmental teacher evaluation in China [J]. Education Science, 2005(1):14-16. [9] Mou Jinbao. Evaluation of Teachers' Professional Development in China: Current Situation, Hot Spots and Trends [J]. Journal of Tibet University for Nationalities (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2020(2):146-152. [10] Zeng Wenxi, Luo Shengquan. Value analysis of foreign primary and secondary school teachers' core qualities [J]. Foreign primary and secondary education, 2017(7): 9-16.