Research on Knowledge Graph Construction Technology Based on Intellectual Property Legal Documents

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jike.202404103

Author(s)

Linrui Han

Affiliation(s)

The Institute for Data Law, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, China

Abstract

Amidst the dual thrust of artificial intelligence development and the construction of legal informatization, knowledge graphs are increasingly applied in areas such as judicial judgment assistance, legal retrieval, and question answering. Addressing the heterogeneity of intellectual property rules and the complexity of case semantics, this paper aims to propose a construction method for a legal knowledge graph in the field of intellectual property. This method establishes an ontological framework covering 84 concepts, 89 relationships, and 105 attributes. It then employs the CasRel and BiLSTM-CRF models to extract entities and relationships from 3,713 intellectual property judicial cases, integrating these with the conceptual-level ontology using the TransE knowledge alignment model. Finally, a visualization platform is built on the Neo4j database to display and manage the knowledge graph, and a knowledge reasoning model is developed using the TransD algorithm to facilitate intelligent question answering. The knowledge graph constructed in this study provides a critical knowledge resource for legal research, case analysis, and decision support.

Keywords

Legal Knowledge Graph; Intellectual Property; Legal Documents; Knowledge Reasoning; Intelligent System

References

[1] Wang Guozhu. The Special Jurisprudence of Intellectual Property Infringement Liability. Legal Science (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law), 2022, 40(04):114-125. [2] Liu Huabing. Exploration of the Application Patterns of Knowledge Graphs in Big Data of Intellectual Property. Science Technology and Publishing, 2018(12):95-98. [3] Xia Xiangyang, Xiao Wen. Knowledge Map Analysis of International Patent Information Research in the Field of Social Sciences. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 49(6): 64-77. [4] Gao Xiang. Construction of Legal Knowledge Graph for Civil Judicial Application of Artificial Intelligence—Based on the Theory of Element-Fact Type Civil Judgments. Law and Social Development, 2018, 24(06):66-80. [5] Li Zonghui. Theoretical Analysis and Practical Consideration of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Legislation. Science and Society, 2022, 12(04):84-105. [6] Wang Di. Data Modeling of the Evidence Standard System — Based on the Innovation and Application of Legal Knowledge Graphs. People’s Procuratorate, 2020(23):33-36. [7] Wang Chunlei, Wang Xiao, Liu Kai. A Review of Multimodal Knowledge Graph Representation Learning. Journal of Computer Applications, [Online] 1-19. [8] Wang Haofen, Qi Guilin, Chen Huajun. Knowledge Graph: Methods, Practice and Application. Nanjing: Electronics Industry Publishing House, 2019: 425. [9] Liu Duolin, Lü Miao. Simulation of Distributed Web Crawler Data Collection Algorithm under Scrapy Framework. Computer Simulation, 2023, 40(06):504-508. [10] Zhou L, Zhang D. NLPIR: A Theoretical Framework for Applying Natural Language Processing to Information Retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2003, 54(2): 115-123. [11] Wang Ning, Liu Wei, Lan Jian. Construction and Completion of Legal Knowledge Graphs Based on Court Judgment Documents. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Science Edition), 2021, 53(03):23-29. [12] Yang Zexia: “A Review of Legal Knowledge Graph Construction Technology”, published on the WeChat public account “Tsinghua University Institute for Intelligent Legal Systems”, August 1, 2022. [13] Lü Feiyi, Liu Jianxin. Determination of Case Cause and Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property Civil Cases. Intellectual Property, 2011(09):41-44. [14] “Data Analysis Study on Common Intellectual Property Infringement Cases Based on Public Documents (September 2006 - September 2020)”. China Applied Jurisprudence, 2021(06):158-188. [15] Devlin J, Chang M W, Lee K, et al. Bert: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805, 2018. [16] Wu Jun, Cheng Yao, Hao Han, et al. Research on Chinese Professional Term Extraction Based on BERT Embedding BiLSTM-CRF Model. Journal of Information Science, 2020, 39(04):409-418. [17] Huang Z, Xu W, Yu K. Bidirectional LSTM-CRF Models for Sequence Tagging. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.01991, 2015. [18] Lample G, Ballesteros M, Subramanian S, et al. Neural Architectures for Named Entity Recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.01360, 2016. [19] Sun Z, Hu W, Li C. Cross-lingual Entity Alignment via Joint Attribute-Preserving Embedding. In: The Semantic Web–ISWC 2017: 16th International Semantic Web Conference, Vienna, Austria, October 21–25, 2017, Proceedings, Part I. Springer International Publishing, 2017: 628-644. [20] Wei Z, Su J, Wang Y, et al. A Novel Cascade Binary Tagging Framework for Relational Triple Extraction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.03227, 2019. [21] Cai L, Wang W Y. KBGAN: Adversarial Learning for Knowledge Graph Embeddings. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.04071, 2017. [22] Ling W, Dyer C, Black A W, et al. Two/too Simple Adaptations of Word2Vec for Syntax Problems. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2015: 1299-1304. [23] Saeedizade M J, Torabian N, Minaei-Bidgoli B. KGRefiner: Knowledge Graph Refinement for Improving Accuracy of Translational Link Prediction Methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.14233, 2021. [24] Miller J J. Graph Database Applications and Concepts with Neo4j. In: Proceedings of the Southern Association for Information Systems Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA. 2013, 2324(36): 141-147. [25] Hölsch J, Grossniklaus M. An Algebra and Equivalences to Transform Graph Patterns in Neo4j. In: EDBT/ICDT 2016 Workshops: EDBT Workshop on Querying Graph Structured Data (GraphQ). 2016. [26] Fusar‐Poli P. TRANSD Recommendations: Improving Transdiagnostic Research in Psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 2019, 18(3): 361.