Unraveling the Neural Mechanisms of Language Processing: Electroencephalography Technology and Analysis Methods

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jmpe.202418404

Author(s)

Yajun Wang*

Affiliation(s)

School of Foreign Studies, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China *Corresponding Author.

Abstract

The application of electroencephalography (EEG) technology in language research has significantly broadened our understanding of the functional, temporal, and anatomical dimensions of language processing. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the primary methods employed to analyze EEG data in the context of neurolinguistics, including Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) Component analysis, Time-Frequency (TF) analysis, Topographic analysis, and Connectivity analysis. ERPs offer insights into the timing and sequence of neural events associated with language tasks, while TF analysis sheds light on how different frequency bands are involved in various aspects of language comprehension and production. Topographic analysis maps the spatial distributions of neural activity, and Connectivity analysis explores the interactions between different brain regions during language processing. By leveraging these analytical techniques, researchers can unravel the complex neural mechanisms that facilitate language comprehension and production. Furthermore, this paper critically examines the advantages of EEG, such as its high temporal resolution and non-invasiveness, along with its limitations, including spatial resolution constraints and susceptibility to artifacts. Through this analysis, we aim to highlight the pivotal role of EEG in advancing our understanding of the neural underpinnings of language and discuss future directions for enhancing the methodology and application of EEG in language research.

Keywords

Language Processing; Neural Mechanisms; Electroencephalography; ERPs Component Analysis; TF Analysis; Topographic Analysis; Connectivity Analysis

References

[1] Mangun, G. R., Hillyard, S. A. Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1991, 17(4): 1057-1074. [2] Luck, S. J. An introduction to event related potentials and their neural origins. An introduction to the event related potential technique, 2005, 11. [3] Luck, S. J. Multiple mechanisms of visual-spatial attention: recent evidence from human electrophysiology. Behavioural Brain Research, 1995, 71(1-2): 113-123. [4] Luck, S. J., Hillyard, S. A. Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology, 1994, 31: 291-308. [5] Vogel, E. K., Luck, S. J. The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology, 2000, 37(2): 190-203. [6] Curran, T., Dien, J. Differentiating amodal familiarity from modality specific memory processes: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 2003, 40: 979-988. [7] Kutas, M., Van Petten, C. K., Kluender, R. Psycholinguistics electrified II (1994–2005). In: Traxler, M. J., Gernsbacher, M. A. (Eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 2nd ed., New York, NY: Elsevier Press, 2006, pp. 1-67. [8] Swaab, T. Y., Ledoux, K., Camblin, C. C., Boudewyn, M. A. Language-related ERP components. Oxford handbook of event-related potential components, 2012, pp. 397-440. [9] Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P. J. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 1992, 31(6): 785-806. [10] Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P. J., Swinney, D. A. Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1994, 20(4): 786. [11] Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., Holcomb, P. The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2000, 15(2): 159-201. [12] Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A. W., Mäntysalo, S. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica, 1978, 42(4): 313-329. [13] Molnar, M., Polka, L., Baum, S., Steinhauer, K. Learning two languages from birth shapes pre-attentive processing of vowel categories: Electrophysiological correlates of vowel discrimination in monolinguals and simultaneous bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2014, 17(3): 526-541. [14] Bastiaansen, M., Hagoort, P. Frequency-based segregation of syntactic and semantic unification during online sentence level language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2015, 27(11): 2095-2107. [15] Murray, M. M., Brunet, D., Michel, C. M. Topographic ERP analyses: A step-by-step tutorial review. Brain Topography, 2008, 20(4): 249-264. [16] Jost, L. B., Radman, N., Buetler, K. A., Annoni, J. M. Behavioral and electrophysiological signatures of word translation processes. Neuropsychologia, 2018, 109: 245-254. [17] Issa, M. F., Juhasz, Z., Kozmann, G. EEG analysis methods in neurolinguistics: A short review. Interdisciplinary Hungarian Health Care, 2018, 17(2): 48-54. [18] García, A. M., Mikulan, E., Ibáñez, A. A neuroscientific toolkit for translation studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2016, 128: 21-46.