Measurement of Regional Science and Technology Innovation (STI) Capability and Construction of Multi-center Inclusive Development Network
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jmsd.202412212
Author(s)
Haiyun Sun*
Affiliation(s)
Department of Public Administration, Party School of the CPC Shandong Provincial Committee (Shandong Academy of Governance), Jinan, Shandong, China
*Corresponding Author.
Abstract
In the ever-evolving landscape of global competitiveness, the study of regional Science, Technology, and Innovation (STI) capabilities has emerged as a crucial tool for understanding and enhancing the dynamism and resilience of economies. The methodology of this study is anchored in a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative and qualitative analyses to offer a holistic view of regional STI capabilities. The study employs a range of indicators, including R&D expenditure, STEM education metrics, innovation outputs, and economic contributions of high-tech industries. These indicators are normalized and aggregated into a composite index, providing a measurable framework to assess and compare STI capacities across regions. The value of building a multi-center STI network based on regional capabilities is a cornerstone of this study. Such networks harness the diverse strengths of various innovation centers, facilitating knowledge transfer, resource sharing, and joint problem-solving. This study represents a significant step towards understanding and enhancing regional STI capabilities. Through its comprehensive approach, it not only contributes to academic discourse but also offers practical guidance for stakeholders in crafting strategies that leverage innovation for regional development and global competitiveness.
Keywords
Regional STI; Measurement System; Polycentric Network; Inclusive Development
References
[1] Aiginger, K., & Firgo, M. Regional competitiveness: connecting an old concept with new goals. In R. Huggins, & P. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of Regions and Competitiveness: Contemporary Theories and Perspectives on Economic Development (pp. 155e191). Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017.
[2] Beynon, M., Jones, P., & Pickernell, D. Innovation and the knowledge-base for entrepreneurship: Investigating SME innovation across European regions using fsQCA. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 2021, 33(3-4):227-248.
[3] Chesbrough, H.W., Bogers, M. Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. En New frontiers in Open Innovation (New frontiers in open innovation). Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014.pp. 3–28.
[4] Tartaruga, I., Sperotto, F. & Carvalho, F. Addressing inclusion, innovation, and sustainability challenges through the lens of economic geography: Introducing the Hierarchical Regional Innovation System, Geography and Sustainability, 2023.
[5] Tödtling, F., Trippl, M., Desch, V. New directions for RIS studies and policies in the face of grand societal challenges. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2022, 30 (11):2139-2156.
[6] Alvarez-Meaza, I., Pikatza-Gorrotxategi, N., Rio-Belver, R.M. Knowledge sharing and transfer in an open innovation context: mapping scientific evolution. J. Open Innov.: Technol., Mark. Complex. 2020, 6 (4): 186.
[7] Brundtland, G. H. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987.
[8] Schiederig, T., Tietze, F., & Herstatt, C. Green innovation in technology and innovation management e an exploratory literature review. R D Manag, 2012, 42(2), 180e192.
[9] Schiederig, T., Tietze, F., & Herstatt, C. Green innovation in technology and innovation management e an exploratory literature review. R D Manag., 2012, 42 (2), 180e192.
[10] Ma, R. et al.Study of Evaluating High-quality Economic Development in Chinese Regions. China Soft Science.7.2019, pp.60-67.
[11] Hua, J. &Hu J. X.Evaluation of the coupling relationship between regional science and technology innovation and high-quality economic development in China. Science & Technology Progress and Policy. 2019, 36(08): 19-27.
[12] Chew, A.-L., Sharma, R.S., Bontis, N. Intellectual wealth of nations revisited: operationalising the value cycle of innovation. Knowl. Process Manag. 2014, 21 (1):1–12.
[13] Li, X., Nosheen, S., Haq, N.U., Gao, X. Value creation during fourth industrial revolution: use of intellectual capital by most innovative companies of the world. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 163, 120479, 2021.
[14] Diebolt, C., Hippe, R. The long-run impact of human capital on innovation and economic development in the regions of Europe. Appl. Econ. 2019, 51 (5):542–563.
[15] Chege, S.M., Wang, D. Information technology innovation and its impact on job creation by SMEs in developing countries: an analysis of the literature review. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 2020, 32 (3): 256–271.
[16] Paramati, S.R., Alam, M.S., Hammoudeh, S., Hafeez, K. Long-run relationship between R&D investment and environmental sustainability: evidence from the European Union member countries. Int. J. Financ. Econ. 2021, 26 (4):5775–5792.
[17] Aldieri, L., Bruno, B., Vinci, C.P. Does environmental innovation make us happy? An empirical investigation. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 2019, 67, 166–172.
[18] Wang, Q., Lin, Sh.F., Guan H.Sh. The Level of Effective Technological Innovation in China: Evaluation,Measurement and the Causes Identification of Regional Disparity. Statistics & Decision.2023, 7: 103-120.
[19] Zhang, J. Research on the Ways and Countermeasures to Strengthen the Support of State owned Enterprises to China’s National Independent Innovation Ability System. Hebei Academic Journal.2022, 42 (6):120-129.
[20] González, M., J.J., Álvarez, C. Gestión de Conocimiento e Innovación Abierta: Hacia la conformación de un modelo teórico relacional. Rev. Venez. De. Gerenc. 2019, 24 (88).
[21] Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action, 2023. Innovation Policy.
[22] Lopez-Rubio, P., Roig-Tierno, N., & Mas-Tur, A. Which regions produce the most innovation policy research?Pol. Stud,2021.
[23] Bozeman, B. Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Res. Policy 2020, 29 (4–5):627–655.
[24] Florida, R. The Economic Geography of Talent. Annals of the Association of American Geographers.2002, 92(4):743-755.
[25] Wei, Q.F., Guo, A.N., Sheng, Y. The grouping effect of multifactor-driven regional innovation development under the perspective of industrial agglomeration: taking Chengdu-Chongqing economic circle as an example. Soft Science. Nov, 2023.
[26] Zhan, Y., Li,S. Financial development, technical innovation and the construction of smart cities: An informatization development perspective. Journal of Finance and Economics. 2016, 42(2).
[27] Chou, Y., Li, Y.K. On urban innovation ability influenced by urbanization: A case study of the 28 cities of the city clusters along the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition). 2017, 20 (6).
[28] Zhao, L.L., Zhang, Y.X. Threshold effects of social capital on regional innovation capability from the institutional environments perspective. Science & Technology Progress and Policy.2015, 32 (7).
[29] Wang, G.B., Guan, C.H. The Measurement and Its Spatial Pattern Characteristics of Innovation Level of Cities above Prefecture Levels in China. Reform of Economic System. 2019, 6: 46-52.
[30] Li, L., Ding, L.T. Spatio-temporal evolution and distributional dynamics of regional science and technology innovation level development in China. Statistics & Decision. 2023, 39(21).