STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
Impact of Knowledge Governance on Risk Immunization in the Quality Chain
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jmsd.202412230
Author(s)
Yan Yan*, Hui Sun, Qiang Liu, Hongyan Li
Affiliation(s)
School of Economics and Management, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou, Liaoning, China *Corresponding Author.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore the mechanism of knowledge governance's impact on quality chain risk immunization. By analyzing relevant literature and cases, the study finds that knowledge governance positively affects the quality chain risk immunity of enterprises. By providing the necessary information and data support, enhancing risk identification and prediction capabilities, and improving the ability to respond to risk events, knowledge governance helps enterprises cope with quality chain risks better, ensure product quality and supply chain stability, and then enhance their competitiveness and sustainable development, helping them to be able to comprehensively grasp and analyze data, identify potential quality chain risk factors, and provide a solid foundation for risk prevention. Through the establishment of knowledge governance, it helps enterprises to comprehensively grasp and analyze data, identify potential quality chain risk factors, and provide a solid foundation for risk prevention. Through the establishment of a knowledge base, expert team and training mechanism, enterprises can summarize and share the lessons learned in the past to form collective wisdom and provide valuable references for similar risk events in the future.
Keywords
Knowledge Governance; Quality Chain; Supply Chains; Risk Immunization; Bioimmunity
References
[1]Wu Qiqi. Research on the impact of knowledge governance on enterprise innovation performance of platform-based enterprises. Bohai Economic Outlook, 2022(04): 161-163. [2]Zheng Chi-Jian, Zhou Jie, Zhang Slow. Impact of knowledge governance on improvisation behavior in start-ups. Journal of Shandong Institute of Commerce and Industry, 2022, 36(04): 67-77. [3]Cao Yue, Bi Xinhua. Value co-creation model and knowledge governance mechanism in open innovation communities. Science and Technology Management Research, 2021, 41(06): 149-155. [4]Wu Yanghui, Pang Liwei, Zhang Zhenhai. Exploring the quality risk of fresh produce supply chain based on AHP. Mall Modernization, 2023, (15): 37-39. [5]Lin Zhonggao. Logical mechanism of internal control risk immunity: An analysis framework based on ecological perspective. Journal of Changzhou University (Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 21(01): 51-67. [6]Jiang Fengzhen, Yang Qian, Zhang Jie et al. Game analysis of corporate knowledge governance investment and knowledge-based employee leaving behavior based on ERG theory. Operations Research and Management, 2023, 32(07): 113-120. [7]Zhao, Honglin. A study on the relationship between supply chain relationship quality and product innovation performance - the moderating effect of formal knowledge governance. Green Technology, 2021, 23(10): 271-273+277. [8]Yu Miao, Zhu Fangwei, Zhang Jie et al. Knowledge Governance: Origin, Frontier Research and Theoretical Framework. Research Management, 2021, 42(04): 65-72. [9]Tang Lu, Liu Wei. A new mechanism for governance of corporate global R&D networks - A case study of headquarters technology outposting to promote cross-border integration of tacit knowledge. Management World, 2024, 40(01): 135-155. [10]Liang Y, Liu Q, Guo Y, et al. Quality Risk Immune Mechanism of Core Enterprises in Manufacturing Supply Chain. Financial Engineering and Risk Management, 2021, 4(2): 8-13. [11]Li L, Gong Y, Wang Z, et al. Big data and big disaster: a mechanism of supply chain risk management in global logistics industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2023, 43(2): 274-307.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved