Game Theory Analysis of Cooperation between Officers and Soldiers, Grassroots Leaders and Regulatory Agencies in Dealing with Mobile Internet Addiction

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jmsd.202512416

Author(s)

Zhongwen Li*

Affiliation(s)

College of Systems Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, China

Abstract

From a game theory perspective, this study systematically constructs a collaborative governance theoretical framework for mobile phone addiction among officers and soldiers. By establishing a tripartite game model involving officers and soldiers, grassroots leaders, and regulatory authorities, it reveals behavioral evolution patterns under different governance strategies. Based on the replicative dynamic equations of officers and soldiers, grassroots leaders, and regulatory authorities, this study further develops a three-dimensional evolutionary game system to mitigate mobile phone addiction. The study further discusses the stability of evolutionary strategy combinations and equilibrium points under their joint influence. The proactive reduction of mobile phone addiction by officers and soldiers through interactions between officers and soldiers, regulatory authorities, and grassroots leaders. Under the pressure from regulatory authorities and grassroots leadership participation, officers and soldiers demonstrate motivation to address mobile phone addiction issues.

Keywords

Mobile Network Addiction Problem; Evolution Game; Officers and Soldiers; Grassroots Leaders

References

[1] WEN J, SONG X, SHAO X, et al. Relationship between self-efficacy and smartphone addiction among the military personnel: a moderated mediation model. Journal of Navy Medicine, 2023, 44(4):332-337. [2] WANG M, ZHANG J, YANG S, et al. Correlation between self-control and mobile phone dependence of 325 soldiers in a troop. Occup and Health, 2021, 37(24): 3399-3402. [3] LAN Y, DING J, ZHU X, et al. A review of the mobile phone addiction research. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2019, 23(11): 1328-1333. [4] ALLISON, FASS. Game Theory. Forbes, 2005, 176(10): 93-94. [5] ROSS, D. Evolutionary game theory and the normative theory of institutional design: Binmore and behavioral economics. Politics Philosophy & Economics, 2006, 5(1): 51-79. [6] DAVID M A. Game-Changer: Game Theory and the Art of Transforming Strategic Situations. Journal of Economic Literature, 2014, 52(4): 1167-68. [7] HUANG S, GOLMAN R. The collective wisdom of behavioral game theory: The collective wisdom of behavioral game theory: S. Huang, R. Golman. Economic Theory, 2025, 79(1): 341-356. [8] GOLDSTEIN A S. Nudge Theory Application in Military Settings. Military Psychology, 2019, 31(4): 287-302. [9] K S. Institutional Gaming Framework. American Political Science Review, 2017, 111(3): 467-489. [10] STERMAN J D, REPENNING N P. COMPACT Organizational Model. Management Science, 2019, 65(8): 3421-3438. [11] PAPADOPOULOS Y. Cooperative forms of governance: Problems of democratic accountability in complex environments. European Journal of Political Research, 2003, 42(4): 473-501. [12] HENDRIKSE, GEORGE, W., et al. Managerial vision bias and cooperative governance. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2015, 42(5): 797-828. [13] JOHNSON-FREESE J, SCHMIDT N. Reaching for the stars: The case for cooperative governance of directed energy technologies. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 2020, 76: 150 - 155. [14] SUN Y, ZHANG Y F, WANG Y, et al. Cooperative governance mechanisms for personal information security: an evolutionary game approach. Kybernetes, 2025, 54(1): 431-455.