STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
Ecological Resource Rights Trading and Transformation Paths in the Northern Ecological Development Zone of Guangdong Province
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jmsd.202512503
Author(s)
Hailing Jiang*
Affiliation(s)
Zhongkai University of Agricultural and Engineering, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China *Corresponding Author
Abstract
The ecological region in northern Guangdong Province is an important part of the regional pattern of "one core, one belt and one area". It has obvious advantages in ecological resources, but its economy and society are relatively lagging behind. In order to achieve a higher level of regional coordination and promote common prosperity, this study discusses the transformation path of ecological resource rights and interests transactions. Research and calculate the trading potential of forest coverage indicators, pilot forestry carbon sink carbon inclusive projects and other methods, indicating that the transformation path includes forest coverage indicator trading and forestry carbon sink trading, etc., and proposes to build a forest coverage indicator trading platform and expand forestry carbon sequestration Suggestions such as the scope of carbon inclusive pilot projects.
Keywords
Rights and Interests of Ecological Resources; Transactions; Conversion Path
References
[1]Felix Müller, Benjamin B. The indicator side of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 2012, 1(1): 26-30. [2]United Nations. System of environmental-economic accounting 2012: central framework-white cover publication. New York: United Nations, 2014: 1-8. [3]Preece Catherine, Canarini Alberto, Verbruggen Erik, Fuchslueger Lucia. Editorial: Exchanges at the Root-Soil Interface: Resource Trading in the Rhizosphere That Drives Ecosystem Functioning. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 2021, 20-32. [4]Jizhong Wan, Xiaodan Wang. Linking forest coverage and fragmentation to the dark diversity of plant communities under different forest management practices. Journal of environmental management, 2025, 21-42. [5]Diswandi D. A hybrid coasean and pigouvian approach to payment for ecosystem services program in west lombok: does it contribute to poverty alleviation? Ecosystem Services, 2017, 23: 138-145. [6]Zhang Linbo, Yu Huiyi, Hao Chaozhi, et al. Redefinition and connotation analysis of ecosystem product. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34(3): 655-660. [7]Caihong Tang, Yunfei Long, Yu Tang, et al. Impact of economic growth and agricultural expansion on forest cover in ASEAN: New evidence for forest transition theory. Forest Policy and Economics, 2025, 17-35. [8]Kailin Zhu, Dongfang Lin, Haiqiang Fu, et al Accuracy and consistency assessment of forest cover datasets: a comparative study of two provinces in China. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 2025, 16-27. [9]Neha Bhargava, Qamar Alam. Impact of economic growth on forest cover in India: a sectoral analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2025: 1-24. [10]Yue Xiao, Koji Shimada, Songdong Shao, et al. The diminishing incentive of ecological fiscal transfer on local government environmental expenditure — Evidence from National Key Ecological Function Zone in China. Ecological Economics, 2025, 23-38. [11]Brayan Tillaguango, Rafael Alvarado, Munir Ahmad, et al. Impact of agricultural employment, gross domestic product, informal economy, institutional quality on forest cover in Ecuador. Forest Policy and Economics, 2025, 17-30. [12]Júlia Ramos Nardy, Anna Duden, Alexandre Camargo Martensen, et al. The role of farmer’s resources, capabilities and perceptions on reforestation and forest cover in the Atlantic Forest. Land Use Policy, 2025, 15-26. [13]Alessia D'Agata, Piermaria Corona, Luca Salvati. Deriving forest cover rates from map sources: A contribution to official statistics and environmental reporting. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2025, 07-18. [14]Yuan Yao, Xiangming Xiao, Yuanwei Qin, et al. Improved annual forest cover maps in Oklahoma from analyses of PALSAR-2, Landsat, and LiDAR data sets during 2015–2021. Frontiers of Earth Science, 2025, 19(2): 1-18. [15]Guangyang Li, Hongyan Lai, Bangqian Chen, et al. Spatial Distribution Pattern of Forests in Yunnan Province in 2022: Analysis Based on Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data and Machine Learning. Remote Sensing, 2025, 17(7): 11-22. [16]C. Ronnie Drever, Alison M. Long, Susan C. Cook Patton, et al. Restoring forest cover at diverse sites across Canada can balance synergies and trade-offs. One Earth, 2025, 8(2): 10-25.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved