STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
A Study on the Mechanism of Cultural Differences among New Employees Influencing Implicit Followership
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jmsd.202512517
Author(s)
Wei Zhang*
Affiliation(s)
School of Management, Guangdong University of Science and Technology, Dongguan, Guangdong, China *Corresponding Author
Abstract
Leadership is a collaborative process with followership, in which leaders and followers define, develop, and manage their mutual relationship. This study focuses on implicit followership at the individual level, using new employees as subjects. It introduces two distinct follower role cognitive structures-positive and negative implicit followership examining how traditional and modern individual orientations influence followers’ implicit followership. It derives and substantiates the constituent elements and structural patterns of follower role perceptions formed by new employees entering the workplace, expanding prior research on the antecedents of implicit following at the individual level and offering theoretical contributions to this field.
Keywords
Traditionality; Modernity; Positive Implicit Followership; Negative Implicit Followership
References
[1]Sy, T. What do you think of followers? Examining the Content, Structure, and Consequences of Implicit Followership Theories. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2010, 113(2): 73-84. [2]Duong J. Leaders' Conceptions and Evaluations of Followers as Antecedents of Leadership Style, Leader-Member Exchange and Employee Outcomes. Alliant International University, Marshall Goldsmith School of Management, Los Angeles, 2011. [3]Kruse, E. T., Sy, T., Tram, S. Hearts and Minds: Implicit Theories of Followership Bridge Personality and Transformational Leadership. Presented at the Academy of Management, Boston, MA. 2012. [4]Braun, S., Stegmann, S., Hernandez, A. S., et al. Think Manager-Think Male, Think Follower-Think Female: Gender Bias in Implicit Followership Theories. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2017, 47(7):377-388. [5]Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., et al. Our Followers Are Lions, Theirs Are Sheep: How Social Identity Shapes Theories About Followership and Social Influence. Political Psychology, 2018, 39(1):23-42. [6]Hoption, C., Han, J.M. “Mommy and Me”: Raising Implicit Followership Theories. Industrial and Commercial Training, 2021, 53(2):117-127. [7]Sy, T., Shore, L. M., Strauss, J., et al. Leadership Perceptions as a Function of Race–Occupation Fit: The Case of Asian Americans. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2010, 95(5):902-919. [8]Hong,Y.Y., Morris, M. W., Chiu,C.Y., & Benet-Martínez, V. Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 2000, 55(7), 730–751. [9]Yang, G., Yu, A., Ye, M. Traditionalism and Modernity of Chinese People: Concepts and Measurement. Taipei: Crown Books Company, 1989. [10]Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., Lin, S. C. Impetus for Action: A Cultural Analysis of Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Chinese Society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42(3): 421-444. [11]Farh, J.-L., Hsu, C., Liang, J., & Wang, B. Vertical and horizontal dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A comparison of African Americans and mainland Chinese. Management and Organization Review, 2007, 3(3), 419–456. [12]Zhang, X., & Wilder, D. A.Effects of Confucian values and perceived parental pressure on Chinese college students’ career decision-making difficulties: The mediating role of self-differentiation. Journal of Career Development, 2017, 44(5), 387–401. [13]Hwang, K.-K.Filial piety and loyalty: Two types of moral obligation in Chinese society. Asian Journal of Social Psychology.1998, 1(1), 245–265. [14]Wang, M. The Reversal of Weak Negotiators. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2018. [15]Carsten, M.K.,Uhl-Bien, M., West, B.J., et al. Exploring Social Constructions of Followership: A Qualitative Study. The Leadership Quarterly, 2010, 21(3): 543-562. [16]Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 1981, 18(1):39-50. [17]Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.1998. [18]Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, Jr, J. A., Purc-Stephenson, R. Reporting Practices in Confirmatory Factor Analysis: An Overview and Some Recommendations. Psychological Methods, 2009, 14(1), 6-23.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved