STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
AI-Enabled Transnational Fraud: Risk Evolution, Governance Dilemmas, and Regulatory Pathways
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jmsd.202612302
Author(s)
Jingjing Zheng
Affiliation(s)
School of Finance and Accounting, Fuzhou University of International Studies and Trade, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence has rapidly changed the technical conditions under which cross-border fraud is produced, distributed, and concealed. Unlike traditional fraud, which relies heavily on manual scripts, fake identities, phone calls, and fraudulent websites, generative AI enables criminals to create realistic text, cloned voices, synthetic images, deepfake videos, and personalized deception strategies at low cost and large scale. This article examines the emerging risks of generative AI-enabled cross-border fraud and analyzes why such fraud is difficult to govern under existing regulatory frameworks. The study argues that generative AI increases the credibility, precision, scalability, and concealment of cross-border fraud by combining identity impersonation, data misuse, automated content generation, platform-based dissemination, and complex financial transfer channels. It further proposes a governance framework based on risk classification, platform accountability, financial monitoring, enterprise internal control, personal data protection, public awareness, and international cooperation. The article concludes that the governance of generative AI-enabled cross-border fraud should not rely only on post-event punishment. Instead, it requires a preventive, coordinated, and technologically adaptive regulatory system that balances AI innovation with digital security.
Keywords
Generative AI; Cross-Border Fraud; Deepfake; Data Security; Financial Crime; Digital Governance
References
[1] Alt, T., Ibisch, A., Meiser, C., Wilhelm, A., Zimmer, R., Ditz, J., Dresen, D., Droste, C., Karschau, J., & Laus, F. (2024). Generative ai models: Opportunities and risks for industry and authorities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.04734. [2] Bail, C. A. (2024). Can generative AI improve social science? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(21), e2314021121. [3] Banh, L., & Strobel, G. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence. Electronic markets, 33(1), 63. [4] Button, M. (2012). Cross‐border fraud and the case for an “Interfraud”. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 35(2), 285–303. [5] Ferrari, F., Van Dijck, J., & Van den Bosch, A. (2025). Observe, inspect, modify: Three conditions for generative AI governance. New Media & Society, 27(5), 2788–2806. [6] Fui-Hoon Nah, F., Zheng, R., Cai, J., Siau, K., & Chen, L. (2023). Generative AI and ChatGPT: Applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration. In (Vol. 25, pp. 277–304): Taylor & Francis. [7] Guo, Y., Bao, Y., Stuart, B. J., & Le‐Nguyen, K. (2018). To sell or not to sell: Exploring sellers' trust and risk of chargeback fraud in cross‐border electronic commerce. Information systems journal, 28(2), 359–383. [8] Heinemann, M., & Stiller, W. (2025). Digitalization and cross-border tax fraud: evidence from e-invoicing in Italy. International Tax and Public Finance, 32(1), 195–237. [9] Holmström, J., & Carroll, N. (2024). How organizations can innovate with generative AI. Business Horizons. [10]Ibitoye, J. S. (2025). Multi-agent AI systems for secure, transparent, and compliant fraud surveillance in cross-border FinTech operations. Int J Res Publ Rev, 6(6), 9724–9740. [11]Janssen, M. (2025). Responsible governance of generative AI: conceptualizing GenAI as complex adaptive systems. Policy and Society, 44(1), 38–51. [12]Joshi, R., Pandey, K., & Kumari, S. (2025). Generative AI: A transformative tool for mitigating risks for financial frauds. Generative artificial intelligence in finance: Large language models, interfaces, and industry use cases to transform accounting and finance processes, 125–147. [13]Kaswan, K. S., Dhatterwal, J. S., Malik, K., & Baliyan, A. (2023). Generative AI: A review on models and applications. 2023 international conference on communication, security and artificial intelligence (ICCSAI). [14]Ricker, J., Assenmacher, D., Holz, T., Fischer, A., & Quiring, E. (2024). AI-generated faces in the real world: A large-scale case study of Twitter profile images. Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Research in Attacks, Intrusions and Defenses.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved