STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
Analysis of Hotspots and Trends in Media Ethics Research since the 21st Century: a CiteSpace-based Knowledge Mapping Analysis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jnme.202410112
Author(s)
Xinyu Xu*
Affiliation(s)
Guangzhou Xinhua University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510520, China * Corresponding Author.
Abstract
This paper takes 651 papers in the field of media ethics published in the CNKI database since the 21st century (2000-2023) as samples, and uses CiteSpace software to carry out visual analysis. Since the 21st century, the development of media ethics research in China has been divided into an exploratory period, a developmental period, a period of significant growth, and a period of relative stability, with fewer core authors and without the formation of a sizable research community. There are four clusters in the field of media ethics research: core media ethics, ethical challenges and misconduct, media ecology and ethics, and media literacy education, and the hot research trends in this field are explored in depth. It is found that the research hotspots in this field focus on the study of media ethics issues brought about by the iteration of technology, such as artificial intelligence and big data; media literacy education needs to be vigorously developed to cope with the ethical challenges brought about by the new technology; and media ethics research in China will enter the stage of long-term exploration and development of the new technology, such as artificial intelligence.
Keywords
Media Ethics, Media Literacy Education; Knowledge Graph; CiteSpace
References
[1]Zheng, G. C. & Tian, H. P. (2007). On the Definition of Media Ethics. Ethics Research (05), 78-81. doi:10.15995/j.cnki.llxyj.2007.05.009. [2]Chen Y., Chen C.M., Liu Z.Y. et al. Methodological functions of CiteSpace knowledge graph. Research in Science, 2015, 33(02):242-253. [3]Zheng, G. C. (2007). Media Ethics: A Study of Media Ethics (Doctoral dissertation, Southeast University). [4]Wu F, Wu F. (2004). The construction of the concept of journalism professionalism. Journal of Renmin University of China (06), 122-129. [5]Ji W. M. (2017). Traceability and analysis of concepts related to journalism morality and journalism ethics. Journalism and Communication Research (12), 108-120. [6]Ma, Y & Zhang, P. (2009). Integration and Conflict of Multiple Values: A Deep Explanation of the Causes of Journalism Ethics Misconduct. Journalism and Communication Research (02), 94-102+109. [7]Yi, Q. L. & Meng J. (2013). Ethical Misconduct in Television Communication--The Case of Entertainment Programs. China Television (10), 50-54. [8]Gu, Y. L. & Wu, F. (2018). The ethical dilemma of short video platforms. Contemporary Communication (05), 98-100. [9]Yang S. (2023). Multiple governance of live broadcasting ethical misconduct in the field theory perspective. Chinese Journal of Radio and Television (01), 59-66. [10]Zhou Y. Y., P. Ke & Liu H. O. (2022). A study on human-computer harmony ecological construction for algorithmic recommendation ethical misconduct. Intelligence Theory and Practice (10), 54-61. [11]Zhang A. J., Yao Ying. Alienation and Return of the Subject: Media Ethics Review and Regulation of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Xinyang Normal College (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2023, 43(05):13-20. [12]Song, F. L. (2018). The significance of media literacy to the ethical norms of journalism and the path of enhancement. Media (13), 78-80.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved