Research on Equity Governance of Scientific and Technological Innovation Enterprises

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jse.202411101

Author(s)

Jinfeng Liang, Haiyan Zhao*

Affiliation(s)

Business School, Lingnan Normal University, Zhanjiang 524048, Guangdong, China *Corresponding Author.

Abstract

With the rapid development of our economy, innovation-driven development has become the new normal, scientific innovation enterprises become the important impetus of national development. Technology and innovation are the core ability of the survival and development of scientific and technological innovation enterprises. In the final analysis, the innovation and research of science and technology depend on capital and human resources. In order to achieve the strategic plan and solve the problems of financing, attracting and retaining talents, scientific and technological innovation enterprises often need to carry out reasonable equity governance. In this paper, Xiaomi Company is selected as the case study object based on the previous scholars' research. Literature research method, case analysis method and comparative analysis method are used to study the status quo of Xiaomi Company's equity governance from the two aspects of dual-class share structure and equity incentive policy. Finally, we should give some suggestions for the equity management of Chinese technology innovation enterprises, considering the current developing situation and its own characteristics.

Keywords

Scientific And Innovative Enterprises; Equity Governance; Dual-class Equity Structure; Equity Incentive

References

[1]Shi Xiaojun, Wang Ariran The impact of unique corporate governance mechanisms on firm innovation: global evidence from a two-tier shareholding system of Internet firms. Economic Research, 2017, 52 (01): 149–164. [2]Liao Zhiyu, Zhu Keyue Research on the Impact of Dual-Level Equity Structure on Corporate Performance—Taking Baidu Company as an Example. China Management Informatization, 2019, 22 (05): 6–10. [3]Tong Changfeng, Yang Baoqi Can strengthening core employee equity incentives enhance firm performance?. Economic Jingwei,2019, 36 (01): 118-125. [4]Yan Li, Wang Shan, and Liu Xun Equity incentives, R&D investment, and corporate innovation—based on the empirical data of science and innovation board enterprises. Journal of Hubei University of Economics, 2021, 19 (04): 85–94. [5]Tong Lingzhi. Research on the equity incentive program of Xiaomi group companies after listing. Northeast University of Finance and Economics, 2021. [6]Lin Yi-han. Study on the motivation and economic consequences of the adoption of double-layer equity structures in science-based enterprises. Beijing Foreign Studies University, 2022. [7]Liang Xiaoyu, Research on the Impact of Dual Equity on the Innovation Performance of Science and Technology-Based Enterprises. Anhui University of Finance and Economics, 2022. [8]Liu Yibo. Motivation and effect analysis of dual equity structure in science and technology-based enterprises. Henan University of Finance and Economics, 2021. [9]Yu Xinmeng, Research on the Impact of Equity Incentives on the Performance of Innovative Science and Technology Enterprises. Jiangxi Normal University, 2021. [10]Ying Liu, The Application of Dual Equity Structure in the Corporate Governance of Science and Innovation-Oriented Enterprises. Investment and Entrepreneurship, 2021, 32 (13): 147–149. [11]Luo Tianming, Research on the Application of Dual Shareholding Structure in Science and Innovation-Oriented Enterprises: Taking Xiaomi as an Example. Journal of Tianjin Business Vocational College, 2021, 9 (01): 31–37. [12]Bai Yuhong, Wang Fuying Discussion on the Governance of the Dual Equity Structure Cooperative Economy and Technology, 2022 (15): 130–131. [13]Ren Jiachen. Research on equity incentive programs and their implementation effects underthe dual equity structure of Xiaomi Group. Qingdao University of Science and Technology, 2021.