STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
Study on the Enhancement of Corporate Value Creation Capability through Ambidextrous Innovation: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of High-tech Enterprises in Heilongjiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jse.202411321
Author(s)
Qiuling Zhao
Affiliation(s)
School of Accounting, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
Abstract
In the context of global economic integration and China’s economic transition, knowledge-based enterprises encounter a more complex and volatile competitive environment. From the capability perspective, this paper constructs a model of corporate value-creating capability, positioning ambidextrous innovation as the antecedent variable and the dynamic environment during the transition period as a crucial moderating variable. It also proposes relevant propositions. A total of 164 high-tech enterprises located in Harbin, including Huawei and Tencent, were selected as case samples. The Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) method was employed to test and analyze how ambidextrous innovation enhances corporate value-creating capability. Finally, based on the results of theoretical and empirical analysis, combined with an in-depth examination of the dynamic environment during China’s transition period, practical strategies and recommendations for enhancing the value-creating capability of Chinese knowledge-based enterprises are provided.
Keywords
Ambidextrous Innovation; Dynamic Environment; Corporate Value Creation Capability
References
[1] Jansen J, Van D, Volberda H W. Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators. Management Science, 2006, 52(11): 1661-1674. [2] Cao Q, Gedajlovic E, Zhang H. Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects. Organization Science, 2009, 20(4): 781-796. [3] Wei Jiang, Wang Ding, Liu Yang. Asymmetric Innovation: The Catch-Up Path of Chinese Enterprises. Management Quarterly, 2020, 5(02): 46-59+143. [4] Wu Jianzhu, Hua Xinyi. Mechanisms of Dual Innovation Drive in Enterprises: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on High-Tech Enterprises. Science and Technology Management Research, 2021, 41(8):1-10. [5] Wang Fengbin, Chen Jianxun. Analysis of the Effects of Exploratory and Exploitative Technological Innovation and Their Balance. Management World, 2012(3): 96-112+188. [6] Li Ruixue, Peng Can. Ambidextrous Innovation Synergy and Sustainable Development of Enterprises: The Mediating Role of Competitive Advantage. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(4): 139-148. [7] Sun Hui, Guo Qiuqiu. Environmental Regulation, Dual Innovation, and Enterprise Performance: The Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism. Ecological Economy, 2021, 37(5): 72-78. [8] Xi Lei Peng Can, Li Deqiang. The Impact of Informal Networks on Dual Innovation: The Mediating Role of Absorptive Capacity and the Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism. Research on Science and Technology Management, 2021, 41(6): 132-139. [9] Yang Jinlong, Hu Guangwei. Configurational motivations and enhancement strategies for user-perceived learning effectiveness in mobile learning communities. Research on Modern Information-August 1, 2020 [10] Wu Jianzhuo, Hua Xinyi. Mechanisms Driving Dual Innovation in Enterprises: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on High-Tech. Research on Science and Technology Management, 2021, 41(8): 1-10.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved