The Influence of ESG Recognition, Government Incentive Policy on the High-Quality Development of Enterprise based on Qualitative Analysis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jse.202511207

Author(s)

Muyi Yang1, Anan Wang2,*, Zhihan He3

Affiliation(s)

1Housing and Urban-Rural Development Bureau of Ma'anshan, Anhui, China 2Student Affairs Department, Dali University, Yunnan, China 3Finance Office, Dali University, Yunnan, China *Corresponding Author

Abstract

The study aim to explore the effect of ESG recognition and government incentive policy on the high-quality development of enterprises and assess the potential effect using the mediating impact of green innovation and innovative organization culture between ESG recognition, government incentive policy, and the high-quality development of enterprise based on qualitative analysis.20 senior executives were interviewed in depth interviews were conducted, and data was analyzed involving opening, axial, and selective coding.The study revealed that green innovation positively mediates the relationship between ESG recognition and the high-quality development of enterprises. ESG recognition positively influences innovation organization culture, which, in turn, has a significant positive impact on the high-quality development of enterprise to underscore the importance of a positive attitude in improving ESG recognition and innovation organization culture.

Keywords

ESG Recognition; Government Incentive Policy; High-Quality Development of Enterprise

References

[1]Li, H., & Zhang, J. Towards Sustainable Integration: Techno-Economic Analysis and Future Perspectives of Co-located Wind and Hydrogen Energy Systems[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 146(2),2024. [2]Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Abbas, J., He, C., Pilař, L., & Shah, S. A. R. Tourism, urbanization and natural resources rents matter for environmental sustainability: The leading role of AI and ICT on sustainable development goals in the digital era[J]. Resources Policy, 82, 103445,2023. [3]Lee, H., Calvin, K., Dasgupta, D., Krinmer, G., Mukherji, A., Thorne, P., ... & Zommers, Z. Synthesis report of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6)[J]. Longer report. IPCC,2023. [4]New, M., Liverman, D., Schroder, H., & Anderson, K.[J]. Four degrees and beyond: the potential for a global temperature increase of four degrees and its implications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369(1934), 6-19,2011. [5]Steffen, W., Rockström, J., Richardson, K., Lenton, T. M., Folke, C., Liverman, D., ... & Schellnhuber, H. J. Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(33), 8252-8259,2018. [6]Edmans, A. The end of ESG[J]. Financial Management, 52(1), 3-17,2023. [7]Doni, F., & Johannsdottir, L.Environmental social and governance (ESG) ratings[J].Climate action, 435-449,2020. [8]Li, Z., Chen, S., & Chang, X. Achieving clean energy via economic stability to qualify sustainable development goals in China[J]. Economic Analysis and Policy, 81, 1382-1394,2022. [9]Ma, Y., Shang, M., Yang, F., & Li, C. Exploration of the role of human Capital in China’s high-quality economic development and analysis of its spatial characteristics[J].Sustainability, 15(5), 2023.